2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexural performance of RC beams made with recycled brick aggregate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Research efforts have been dedicated to characterizing the properties of RRC beams and columns in static loading conditions. The influence of RCAs on the monotonic shear [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] or flexural [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] behaviors of RRC beams has also been extensively experimentally investigated, with the replacement ratio (i.e., r) varied from 0% to 100%. The experimental outcomes indicate that: (i) in either shear or flexural failure, the presence of various RCA replacement ratios only has a limited influence on the damage process and failure pattern of RRC beams; (ii) an increased replacement ratio appears to reduce the load-carrying capacity of RRC beams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research efforts have been dedicated to characterizing the properties of RRC beams and columns in static loading conditions. The influence of RCAs on the monotonic shear [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] or flexural [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] behaviors of RRC beams has also been extensively experimentally investigated, with the replacement ratio (i.e., r) varied from 0% to 100%. The experimental outcomes indicate that: (i) in either shear or flexural failure, the presence of various RCA replacement ratios only has a limited influence on the damage process and failure pattern of RRC beams; (ii) an increased replacement ratio appears to reduce the load-carrying capacity of RRC beams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For substitutions of RBA equal to or greater than 50%, although the ultimate flexural load remains at values above the control concrete, the cracking moment decreases by 21% and the deflections The results obtained by Mohammed et al [28] in flexural strength tests of reinforced beams (not prestressed) replacing the entire coarse fraction of natural aggregates with RBA from different origins (first and second class bricks) provided an irrelevant loss in terms of ultimate flexural load and cracking moment. However, the optimal results that they obtained are explained mainly because the fine fraction of natural aggregates was not replaced.…”
Section: Flexural Strength Test Of the Joistsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…There is few research into the use of RBA in structural applications. Mohammed et al [28] compare the flexural behaviour of beams manufactured with RBA from different origins. They used ceramic waste from demolitions, with remains of adhered mortar, but also clean crushed bricks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 2.1. 3…”
Section: Aggregate Production Process and Size Selectionunclassified