2020
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0001600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexural Performance of Composite Prestressed UHPC-NC T-Girders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Te data in the literature [15,18,[22][23][24][25][26] are substituted into the formula and the calculation results are shown in the Table 1.…”
Section: Calculation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Te data in the literature [15,18,[22][23][24][25][26] are substituted into the formula and the calculation results are shown in the Table 1.…”
Section: Calculation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Safdar and Matsumoto have strengthened the RC beam in tension and compression zones, with UHPC of varying thicknesses [22]. LI wang-wang et al have tested seven I-beams composed of UHPC and NC, and also considered the infuence of varying steel reinforcing bars and prestressed reinforcement [25].…”
Section: Specimen Test Collection Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most commonly used volumetric ratio of steel fiber in engineering practice was in the range of 1.5% of 2% based on the authors' previous research. 31,32 Therefore, a ratio of 1.5% was selected in this experimental program. Material properties of each mix were obtained through material tests according to Fundamental Characteristics and Test Methods of Ultra-High Performance Concrete (T/CBMF37-2018).…”
Section: Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mixes 2 and 3 were designed to investigate the effect of the water‐to‐binder ratio, while the volumetric ratio of steel fiber was kept as 1.5%. The most commonly used volumetric ratio of steel fiber in engineering practice was in the range of 1.5% of 2% based on the authors' previous research 31,32 . Therefore, a ratio of 1.5% was selected in this experimental program.…”
Section: Experimental Programmentioning
confidence: 99%