2006
DOI: 10.12989/sem.2006.24.2.195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexural ductility of HSC members

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to verify the accuracy of the proposed analytical model, available experimental data on the flexural behavior of non-strengthened/FRP-strengthened RHSC beams are collected from the existing literature [4,[33][34][35][36][37]. The key parameters of these tested beams are summarized in Table 2.…”
Section: Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to verify the accuracy of the proposed analytical model, available experimental data on the flexural behavior of non-strengthened/FRP-strengthened RHSC beams are collected from the existing literature [4,[33][34][35][36][37]. The key parameters of these tested beams are summarized in Table 2.…”
Section: Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hashemi et al (2009) studied the flexural behavior of RHSC beams strengthened with FRP sheets under four-point bending test [33]. Maghsoudi and Akbarzadeh (2006), and also Rashid and Mansur (2005) have tested RHSC beams under four-point bending test [34][35]. Rabinovitch and Frostig (2003) experimentally investigated flexural response of RHSC beams strengthened and rehabilitated with externally-bonded CFRP strips using four-point bending test [36].…”
Section: Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When applied to RC members, the term ductility implies the ability to sustain significant inelastic deformation prior to collapse. As the evolving technology of using bonded CFRP for strengthening RC beams has attracted much attention in recent years and because HSC behaves like a brittle material, understanding the effects of such materials on the ductility of RC beams is critical (Maghsoudi and Akbarzadeh, 2006;Hashemi et al, 2008).…”
Section: Ductilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For unstrengthened RC members, displacement ductility index, in the range of 3 to 5 is considered imperative for adequate ductility, especially in the areas of seismic design and the redistribution of moments (Maghsoudi and Akbarzadeh 2006). Therefore, assuming that an index value of 3 represents an acceptable lower bound to ensuring the ductile behavior of RC continuous beams strengthened with FRP sheet, it appears that, for the tested beams SC3, SG3 would not meet that requirement ( .…”
Section: Ductilitymentioning
confidence: 99%