2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.05.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexible thermoplastic polyurethane/reduced graphene oxide composite foams for electromagnetic interference shielding with high absorption characteristic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
83
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the initial studies, Yang et al [5] developed polystyrene foams obtaining shielding efficiencies (SE) around 20 dB with 15 wt.% and 7 wt.% carbon nanofibers and nanotubes, respectively. Subsequent works improved the SE or decreased the loading fractions required to achieve commercially attractive EMI shielding materials (around 20 dB in the X-band region (8.2-12.4 GHz)) and mostly looked at thermoplastic or rigid thermoset matrices or coated the foam surfaces with conductive nanofillers [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. These previous studies have demonstrated that the development of the cellular structure causes the redistribution of the nanoparticles, decreasing the average gap between the nanoparticles along the cell walls, thus enhancing the electrical conductivity and EMI shielding properties [9,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the initial studies, Yang et al [5] developed polystyrene foams obtaining shielding efficiencies (SE) around 20 dB with 15 wt.% and 7 wt.% carbon nanofibers and nanotubes, respectively. Subsequent works improved the SE or decreased the loading fractions required to achieve commercially attractive EMI shielding materials (around 20 dB in the X-band region (8.2-12.4 GHz)) and mostly looked at thermoplastic or rigid thermoset matrices or coated the foam surfaces with conductive nanofillers [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. These previous studies have demonstrated that the development of the cellular structure causes the redistribution of the nanoparticles, decreasing the average gap between the nanoparticles along the cell walls, thus enhancing the electrical conductivity and EMI shielding properties [9,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, we calculated the extent of improvement reported on foamed nanocomposites filled with hybrid fillers as a way to establish a comparative analysis ( Table 2 ). It can be observed that our synthesized EPDM foam filled with BT/MWCNTs (20/10 phr) shows the highest percentage of improvement for SE T (40%), compared to the other polymeric foams reported by others [ 7 , 13 , 34 , 44 , 49 , 50 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The small reduction could be attributed to the high elastic shape recovery resulting from the entropic features of cross-linked EPDM networks assisted by the air molecules trapped within the cells. Only one study has been found reporting a decrease in SE T after repeated bending for polyurethane/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite foams at 10 GHz [ 50 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polyurethane nanocomposites are a relatively common group of materials with graphene addition [69,70]. Example of SEM images of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) powders and reduced graphene oxide (RGO) coated TPU powders with 0, 0.5, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5 and 4.5 wt% RGO were shown in Figure 4.…”
Section: Properties Of Selected Composite Materials With Addition Of mentioning
confidence: 99%