2013
DOI: 10.1109/lpt.2013.2249509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexible RF-Based Comb Generator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, and unlike MLLDs, the frequency spacing between lines can be easily changed using the external CW RF synthesizer in a continuous way and with high frequency resolution, as it is also the case when EOMs are used. At this point, it is worth comparing our results with the most energy-efficient OFCG reported up to date [23]. Although a direct comparison is not completely fair as slightly different repetition frequencies are employed (4.2 GHz vs. 6.25 GHz), they are close enough to generalize our results to that repetition frequency (6.25 GHz) with the use of a matching network circuit adapted to this frequency together with our VCSEL (the 3-dB bandwidth of our VCSEL is around 8 GHz as per manufacturer specifications [24]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Furthermore, and unlike MLLDs, the frequency spacing between lines can be easily changed using the external CW RF synthesizer in a continuous way and with high frequency resolution, as it is also the case when EOMs are used. At this point, it is worth comparing our results with the most energy-efficient OFCG reported up to date [23]. Although a direct comparison is not completely fair as slightly different repetition frequencies are employed (4.2 GHz vs. 6.25 GHz), they are close enough to generalize our results to that repetition frequency (6.25 GHz) with the use of a matching network circuit adapted to this frequency together with our VCSEL (the 3-dB bandwidth of our VCSEL is around 8 GHz as per manufacturer specifications [24]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…On the first approach, Mishra et al simulated the effect of using different RF drive signals, in order to find an optimum solution for generating an OFC with less drive power, but with the same spectral flatness and number of lines [99]. In subsequent work [100], the authors demonstrated generation of a 9 line OFC, exhibiting a 1.1 dB of spectral flatness and a 6.25 GHz frequency spacing, using a single DD-MZM (V π = 3.5V), driven by 1 − 1.6V π amplitude RF signals. The main distinction from previous work is that one arm is driven by the fundamental frequency, while the other by the second harmonic, generated by a frequency doubler, as shown in the Fig.…”
Section: A Electro-optic Optical Frequency Comb Generatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the achievable spectral efficiency (SE) is limited by the drift of the individual emission wavelengths and the associated guard bands. For modulatorbased comb sources, the number of comb lines is generally limited by the achievable modulation depth [13] unless complex arrangements of cascaded modulators with synchronized driving signals are used [14,19]. Moreover, if large numbers of lines are to be generated, the power of the comb lines is limited by the power handling capacity and by the insertion loss of the modulator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%