2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.02.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexible operation of post-combustion solvent-based carbon capture for coal-fired power plants using multi-model predictive control: A simulation study

Abstract: Solvent-based post-combustion CO2 capture plant has to be operated in a flexible manner because of its high energy consumption and the frequent load variation of upstream power plants. Such a flexible operation brings out two objectives for the control system: i) the system should be able to change the CO2 capture rate quickly and smoothly in a wide operating range; ii) the system should effectively remove the disturbances from power plant flue gas. To achieve these goals, this paper proposed a multi-model pre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(84 reference statements)
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To make a better use of the interactions between the CFPP and PCC systems and combine them together, the flue gas flowrate and steam flow rate to re-boiler are utilized as additional feedforward signals in the PCC and CFPP controller designs, respectively. Different from the conventional design approaches, which only send the measured flue gas flow rate signals at current sampling time to the PCC controllers [24,30], a method for deep reinforcement integration and coordination of the two systems is proposed in this paper. The method makes full use of the prediction feature of MPC, that takes the current and future estimation of flue gas and re-boiler steam flow rates as respective feedforward signals in MPC_PCC and MPC_CFPP developments.…”
Section: Reinforced Coordinated Control System Design For the Cfpp-pcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To make a better use of the interactions between the CFPP and PCC systems and combine them together, the flue gas flowrate and steam flow rate to re-boiler are utilized as additional feedforward signals in the PCC and CFPP controller designs, respectively. Different from the conventional design approaches, which only send the measured flue gas flow rate signals at current sampling time to the PCC controllers [24,30], a method for deep reinforcement integration and coordination of the two systems is proposed in this paper. The method makes full use of the prediction feature of MPC, that takes the current and future estimation of flue gas and re-boiler steam flow rates as respective feedforward signals in MPC_PCC and MPC_CFPP developments.…”
Section: Reinforced Coordinated Control System Design For the Cfpp-pcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the prediction model (24) is transformed into the augmented style to impose integral action on the MPC, so that an offset-free tracking performance can be obtained in the presence of model-plant mismatch [21]:…”
Section: A Construction Of Prediction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linear model's failure to capture the nonlinear dynamics of the PCC plant will deteriorate the control performance. In order to develop a model predictive controller for wide-range capture rate change, Wu et al [10] proposed a simple nonlinear distribution analysis for solvent-based PCC plant. However, since multi-variable model is used in the analysis, the nonlinearity for a certain input-output loop cannot be revealed in detail.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the local models developed in Section 3.3, this section provides a nonlinearity analysis based on gap metric to quantify the nonlinearity degree of PCC process (as modelled in gCCS). Compared with [10], this paper put more key variables (As listed in Table 1) in consideration to investigate their nonlinear characteristics in a quantitative manner. Nonlinearity measurement is also carried out in SISO model to reveal the relationship between input and output variables at varying capture rates.…”
Section: Nonlinearity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation