2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2016.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexible job shop scheduling problem with parallel batch processing machines: MIP and CP approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhang and Wang [48] proposed a CP model to minimize the makespan by incorporating SDST, part sharing, and disruptions such as machine breakdown, material unavailability, and rush orders. Ham and Cakici [44] applied a CP approach, and demonstrated its superiority with parallel batch-processing machines, compared with another MILP approach. Novas [49] described a CP model that addressed lot splitting for determining the number of sublots or parts in a sublot, as well as the scheduling of production tasks for assigning operations on the sublots.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang and Wang [48] proposed a CP model to minimize the makespan by incorporating SDST, part sharing, and disruptions such as machine breakdown, material unavailability, and rush orders. Ham and Cakici [44] applied a CP approach, and demonstrated its superiority with parallel batch-processing machines, compared with another MILP approach. Novas [49] described a CP model that addressed lot splitting for determining the number of sublots or parts in a sublot, as well as the scheduling of production tasks for assigning operations on the sublots.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ham and Cakici [14] studied an FJSP with parallel batch processing machines (PBM). They developed a mixed integer programming (MIP) model and a constraint programming (CP) model to reduce computational time.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constraints (13) determine earliness duration for each job in each order on each machine. Constraints (14) and (15) define the and as binary variables. Constraints (16), (17), and 18 are non-negativity constraints.…”
Section: Decision Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For batch scheduling problems, as the one presented in this paper, the new constraint programming solvers as the CP Optimizer available in IBM ILOG Optimization Suite (Laborie, 2009), presents some advantages compared with classical mixed-integer optimization approach, as indicated in the studies presented by Ham and Cakici (2016), Ku and Beck (2016) or in Ham et al (2017). Among other facts regarding the CP approach, the authors highlight the ability to write a more natural formulation of the problem, the flexibility and scalability of the code, and the high level description of the problem close to the engineering one where the search algorithms are automatically embedded in the CP solver.…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%