2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2018.01.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexible inverse adaptive fuzzy inference model to identify the evolution of operational value at risk for improving operational risk management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…." [8]. OR has emerged as a key concept for characterising risks arising from phytosanitary and climatic events in agricultural crops and is described by aggregate loss distribution (ALD).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…." [8]. OR has emerged as a key concept for characterising risks arising from phytosanitary and climatic events in agricultural crops and is described by aggregate loss distribution (ALD).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase of SI generates a shift in the comments towards the NA zone of the radar chart, evidencing the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on this tourist destination and its associated products and services. This behaviour was also clearly evident for Italy (Figure 7), where the COVID-19 comments were located toward the NA zone of the radar chart (Right Side -Orange line), standing out in the comments sentiments like Fear, Sadness and Hostility, which clearly shows the impact of the pandemic on this tourism destination (Gonzalez-Ruiz et al, 2019;Pena et al, 2018aPena et al, , 2018b.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Where: For Cumulative Distribution Function, the SI can be zero (CDF's -Centered), Negative (CDF's -Heavy Tails) and Positive (CDF's -Long tails) (Pena et al, 2018a(Pena et al, , 2018b.…”
Section: Skewness Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Balibek and K€ oksalan 2010Multi-objective stochastic programming Consiglio and Staino (2012) Stochastic programming Valladão, Veiga, and Veiga (2014) Stochastic programming Consiglio, Lotfi, and Zenios (2018) Linear programming Venture capital and initial public offerings Ko, Lin, and Yang (2011) Game theory Aouni, Colapinto, and Torre (2014) Fuzzy goal programming Bast i, Kuzey, and Delen (2015) Support vector machines Afful-Dadzie and Afful-Dadzie 2016Multicriteria analysis Quintana, Ch avez, Luque Baena, and Luna (2018) ANFIS, genetic optimization Tian, Xu, and Fujita (2018) Fuzzy systems Zhong, Liu, Zhong, and Xiong (2018) Bayesian inference, Markov Chain Monte Carlo Operational and liquidity risk modeling Chavez-Demoulin, Embrechts, and Ne slehov a 2006Extreme value theory Shevchenko (2009) Bayesian inference Aquaro et al 2010Bayesian networks Shevchenko 2011Bayesian inference Sanford and Moosa (2012) Bayesian networks Janabi, Hernandez, Berger, and Nguyen (2017) Copula modeling Eling and Jung (2018) Copula modeling Peña, Bonet, Lochmuller, Chiclana, and G ongora (2018) Adaptive fuzzy inference model Azar and Dolatabad 2019Fuzzy cognitive maps Derivatives and volatility modeling Bandi and Bertsimas (2014) Linear programming Quek, Pasquier, and Kumar (2007) Neural networks Liu, Cao, Ma, and Shen (2019) Wavelets Neural networks Kim and Won (2018) Deep learning Bezerra and Albuquerque (2017) Support vector machines Zeng and Klabjan (2019) Support vector machines Financial fraud detection Gaganis (2009) Multicriteria analysis, machine learning Dikmen and K€ uc¸€ ukkocao glu (2010) Integer programming Glancy and Yadav (2011) Text mining Abbasi, Albrecht, Vance, and Hansen 2012Stacked generalization Sahin, Bulkan, and Duman (2013) Decision trees Balla, Gaganis, Pasiouras, and Zopounidis (2014) Multicriteria analys...…”
Section: Study Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%