journals.sagepub.com/home/uro Dear editor We read with interest the recent publication by Conway et al. 'Flexible cystoscopy and laser stone fragmentation via Mitrofanoff stoma: a case series'. 1A series of cases of flexible cystoscopy and laser stone fragmentation via a transtomal technique without an access sheath is described in three separate patients with a background of spina bifida, bladder extrophy and an anorectal anomaly, all of whom developed bladder calculi following previous bladder reconstructions. It is mentioned that the latter two patients had a history of vesicocutaneous fistulae following percutaneous cystolithotomy and open cystolithotomy. 1 All three cases did not require an access sheath, were covered with antibiotics and were performed safely, with the latter two done on a day-case basis. 1 The authors are to be commended on yet another technique to facilitate bladder stone removal in the neurogenic bladder patient with a surgically reconstructed conduit mechanism, an inaccessible urethra and nondependent bladder drainage.Neurogenic patients with an inaccessible urethra pose challenges for the urologist, as they do not have dependent bladder drainage. 2 Multiple hybrid techniques have been developed to achieve stone clearance in neurogenic patients with enterocystoplasties, urinary diversions or Mitrofanoff bladders. [3][4][5][6][7] The original Leighton transtomal technique of Mitrofanoff cystolitholopaxy and laser fragmentation did employ a flexible cystoscopy and access sheath (Add-A-Cath) in order to protect mucosal integrity and is suitable for a day-case procedure. 7 A further modification, the Salisbury technique, employed a mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy kit to access a reconstructed neurogenic bladder and also avoided a suprapubic puncture. 8