2005
DOI: 10.1007/11538394_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexible Business Process Management Using Forward Stepping and Alternative Paths

Abstract: The abilty to continuously revise business practices is essential to organizations aiming at reducing their costs and increasing their revenues. Rapid and continuous changes to business processes result in less control over the executed activities. As a result, the ability of process designers to produce solid, well-validated work ‡ow models is limited. Work ‡ow management systems (WfMSs), serving as the main vehicle of business process execution, should recognize these risks and become more dynamic to allow t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Related work in the field of web services is provided, where a formalisation of Web service composition and the definition of compensation semantics in case of failures using the Event B method is proposed. However, although there is a variety of approaches to exception handling and fault tolerance in business process models as well (see Geist and Illibauer for a comprehensive literature review), the approaches basically either investigate exceptions and their recovery in the context of advanced transaction models, which are too rigid for workflow systems, or are not fully integrated and do not address exception handling in a strict formal, intelligible way . Also, the proprietary frameworks enforced by BPM systems make it hard for users to cope with divergent process definitions or unexpected situations; they might have to undertake actions outside their usual work routines, which notably poses security risks.…”
Section: Dynamic Business Process Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related work in the field of web services is provided, where a formalisation of Web service composition and the definition of compensation semantics in case of failures using the Event B method is proposed. However, although there is a variety of approaches to exception handling and fault tolerance in business process models as well (see Geist and Illibauer for a comprehensive literature review), the approaches basically either investigate exceptions and their recovery in the context of advanced transaction models, which are too rigid for workflow systems, or are not fully integrated and do not address exception handling in a strict formal, intelligible way . Also, the proprietary frameworks enforced by BPM systems make it hard for users to cope with divergent process definitions or unexpected situations; they might have to undertake actions outside their usual work routines, which notably poses security risks.…”
Section: Dynamic Business Process Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method can remove the disadvantages of timestamp method. However, in case that existing version is executing, this method cannot cope with the situation when a new version is created and deployed [2,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%