2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2006.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexible and reversible responses to different irradiance levels during photosynthetic acclimation of Cypripedium guttatum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
30
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(41 reference statements)
4
30
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the leaf A max of a widely distributed species like C. guttatum was greater than that of C. flavum when grown at 40-50% of full sunlight, g s in both species was comparable, and the latter species had a higher Chl area (Zhang et al 2006). Alternatively, when both were exposed to contrasting light conditions, their ability to adjust leaf structure and biochemistry under a given irradiance was very similar (Zhang et al 2007). Such properties thus may functionally contribute to coexisting species competing in a similar niche, e.g., by a compensatory effect of higher Chl area (Murchie and Horton 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the leaf A max of a widely distributed species like C. guttatum was greater than that of C. flavum when grown at 40-50% of full sunlight, g s in both species was comparable, and the latter species had a higher Chl area (Zhang et al 2006). Alternatively, when both were exposed to contrasting light conditions, their ability to adjust leaf structure and biochemistry under a given irradiance was very similar (Zhang et al 2007). Such properties thus may functionally contribute to coexisting species competing in a similar niche, e.g., by a compensatory effect of higher Chl area (Murchie and Horton 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different plants may have different sensitivity and responses to different light conditions, depending on their inherent light requirements. With Heptacodium miconioides, Liu et al (2006) indicated that leaf photosynthesis would be impaired by light intensities above 716 lmol m -2 s -1 , whereas this effect would not occur until approximately 1,000 lmol m -2 s -1 in Cypripedium guttatum (Zhang et al 2007). Such unfavorable traits, which can be exposed by changes in the environment, may explain distribution differences because they may cause loss of the ability to adjust and compete with other species, thereby resulting in a decline in the distribution range of a species (Gulías et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This similarity can be explained by the fact that low irradiances of this curve corresponded to early morning and evening measurements, when no significant differences in chl a/b ratios between apical and basal leaves were found. However, the lower chl a/b ratio in basal leaves might also reflect a higher PSII/PSI ratio (Zhang et al 2007) to enhance absorption of the limited quantity of red light available in canopy shade and thus maintain the energy balance between PSII and PSI (Cai et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sun and shade leaves, in the same plant in both woody plants (Araujo et al 2008) and grasses (Yamazaki et al 1999). In particular, compared to shade leaves, sun leaves have higher chlorophyll (chl) a to chl b and photosystem (PS)II to PSI ratios (Yamazaki et al 1999), lower chl/carotenoid ratio values (Lichtenthaler et al 2007), higher values for the capacity to dissipate excess energy (Baker 2008) and higher Rubisco content (Warren and Adams 2001) and photosynthetic capacity (Zhang et al 2007). All these aspects seem to reflect adaptations aimed at optimizing the use of light and avoiding harmful light stress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De acordo com Dixon et al (1990), a fotossíntese (A, de "Assimilation", em inglês) é um dos processos fisiológicos chave fundamentais na modelagem de aspectos de crescimento da árvore, e é utilizada como ferramenta para indicar condições de estresses causadas pelo ambiente e na seleção de condições de crescimento apropriadas para diferentes espécies (PASTENES et al, 2003;LIN;HSU, 2004;ZHANG et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified