Flexibility versus Inflexibility: discursive discrepancy in US democracy promotion and anti-corruption policies

Abstract

Bridoux, J., Gebel, A. (2012). Flexibility versus Inflexibility: discursive discrepancy in US democracy promotion and anti-corruption policies. Third World Quarterly, 33 (10), 1945-1963This article analyses US discourses on democracy promotion and anti-corruption strategies. The analysis shows that there is a cosmetic agreement in these discourses on notions of the good society that identify democracy as a good thing and corruption as a bad thing. However, despite this agreement, there are differences in the discourses on the measures recommended to promote democracy and fight corruption that may lead to policies and processes pulling in opposite directions. This discrepancy arises, on the one hand, from a mode of operation of democracy promotion that is flexible and adaptable to various contexts and, on the other hand, from the uncompromising and inflexible language of anti-corruption policies that threatens to ?undo? what US democracy promotion's rhetoric aims to achieve: ownership and sustainability of democratic reforms through re-empowering the state.preprintPeer reviewe

“Democracy is the Cure?”: Evolving Constructions of Corruption in Indonesia 1994–2014

“…Western-style democracy, as a way of combating corruption in developing countries but it also reflected and reinforced existing power inequalities between the international development community on the one hand, and the 'third world' on the other. More specifically, in focusing attention on government corruption in developing economies, rather than corruption in the 'first world' or multinationals seeking access to developing markets (Bridoux and Gebel 2012;de Maria 2008), the World Bank definition reflected the interests and norms of the West (Hansen 2012;Bedirhanoğlu 2007). It also contributed to the rapid spread in corruption indices and measurement instruments from 2002 onwards, which have lent a scientific and technicist legitimacy to the production of knowledge about corruption (Koechlin 2013).…”

“…Continuing in this tradition, we draw on poststructuralist and postcolonial theories to explore how the meaning of corruption is constructed in relationship to the meaning of democracy, in a particular context and over time. We focus on this relationship because while central to the international anti-corruption movement, it is rarely specified (Bridoux and Gebel 2012). Moreover, local contexts are not static: many have been materially impacted by anti-corruption, development and democratic reform agendas since the mid-1990s.…”

High Stakes Require More Than Just Talk: What to Do About Corruption in Health Systems Comment on "We Need to Talk About Corruption in Health Systems"

“…Critics have suggested that anti-corruption dialogue is motivated by a neoliberal agenda to promote certain forms of social, political, and economic organization, not allowing for truly country-led development. 2,3 Finally, our reticence reflects our chagrin at having very few evidence-based practices we can point to as solutions.…”

As relações entre os poderes executivo e legislativo na formulação da política externa dos Estados Unidos para a promoção da democracia durante os governos Bush e Obama

“…Para Dahl (1972Dahl ( , ed. 2015, o modelo de democracia liberal, a poliarquia, somente é alcançado em sua plenitude quando o país consegue apresentar três conjuntos de requisitos necessários, porém não suficientes, aos indivíduos parte desse sistema: (1) Formular preferências, devendo ter garantias institucionais como a Liberdade de associação, a Liberdade de expressão, o Direito 1 A identificação desse consenso na literatura pode ser vista em Fukuyama e McFaul (2007), Kurki (2010), Grimm e Leininger (2012), Bridoux e Gebel (2012), Bouchet (2013), Kurki (2014), Wolff (2015), Huber (2015). 2 Discussões sobre modelos Socialistas e Social Democratas, entraram em pauta na literatura.…”

“…De modo a atender o modelo democrático como um todo, a promoção da democracia não deve promover somente a democracia eleitoral, mas também o Estado de Direito (Rule of Law) e os Direitos Humanos, conceitos esses incorporados na estratégia de promoção dos Estados Unidos (BRIDOUX e GEBEL, 2012).…”