Flexibility: The next competitive battle the manufacturing futures survey

Abstract

Over the past 4 years research teams from INSEAD (Fontainebleau), Boston University and Waseda University (Tokyo) have administered a yearly survey on the manufacturing strategy of the large manufacturers of the three industrialized regions of the world. In this paper the results for the 1986 survey are compared, One of the most striking results of that year's survey is the emphasis some of the more advanced manufacturers put on their efforts to overcome the trade-off between flexibility and cost efficiency. I n particular for the Japanese respondents these attempts become clear. Europeans and North Americans are not yet seizing the opportunity to cut costs through rapid production and design changes, and are focusing more on traditional cost reduction programmes and the improvement of quality. This might mean that they are preparing the basis on which they can built to obtain added value from flexible automation. If this is the case then the Japanese are clearly ahead.

Economic transition, strategy and the evolution of management accounting practices: the case of India

“…For example, in the field of operations management we found several studies that attempt to characterize international differences in manufacturing practices, broadly defined (e.g. Vastag & Whybark, 1994;DeMeyer et. al, 1989;Womack et.…”

Reporting on Internationalization of Operations, GLOBOP: Design and Management of Global Supply Chains

“…These productive and logistic strategies require a model configured with productive and/or distributed multilocation production, as well as organized direct and inverse logistic flows [5].…”

Investigating the Impact of Communication Satisfaction on Organizational Commitment: A Practical Approach to Increase Employees’ Loyalty

“…However, Rousseau (1998) observes that since careers, in recent years, are described by changability rather than stability especially within the high competitive environments in the surrounding organizations, employees are unlikely and strongly identified with their employers. From an organization's perspective, this trend is disturbing because weak organizational commitment may mean that employees' productivity is less than optimal (Meyer et al, 1989;Vratskikh et al, 2016). Then by effective management communicational methods, opportunity for learning and work schedule flexibility (Rousseau, 1998), organizations can enhance their position among competitors, depending on the strong commitment of employees.…”