2020
DOI: 10.1002/jgt.22567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexibility of planar graphs of girth at least six

Abstract: Let G be a planar graph with a list assignment L. Suppose a preferred color is given for some of the vertices. We prove that if G has girth at least six and all lists have size at least three, then there exists an L-coloring respecting at least a constant fraction of the preferences. * Work on this paper was supported by project 17-04611S (Ramsey-like aspects of graph coloring) of Czech Science Foundation.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(16 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surprisingly, the discharging proof in [4] is quite involved compared to the easy observation that C 3 -free planar graphs are 3-degenerate, which implies 4-choosability. An analogous result holds for {C 3 , C 4 , C 5 }-free graphs, where list of size 3 are sufficient for weighted ε-flexibility and the result is tight [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surprisingly, the discharging proof in [4] is quite involved compared to the easy observation that C 3 -free planar graphs are 3-degenerate, which implies 4-choosability. An analogous result holds for {C 3 , C 4 , C 5 }-free graphs, where list of size 3 are sufficient for weighted ε-flexibility and the result is tight [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The concept of ε-flexibility was introduced by Dvořák, Norin, and Postle [6]. Subsequently, it was studied for various sub-classes of planar graphs, e.g., triangle-free [4], girth six [5], or C 4 -free [9]. Graphs of bounded maximum degree were subsequently characterized in terms of flexibility [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the original paper introducing flexibility [10], where some basic results in terms of maximum average degree were established, the main focus in flexibility research has been on planar graphs. In particular, for many subclasses G of planar graphs, there has been a vast effort to reduce the gap between the choosability of G and the list size needed for flexibility in G. As of now, some tight bounds on list sizes are known: namely, triangle-free planar graphs [8], {C 4 , C 5 }-free planar graphs [20], and {K 4 , C 5 , C 6 , C 7 , B 5 }-free 1 planar graphs [16] are flexibly 4-choosable, and planar graphs of girth 6 [9] are flexibly 3-choosable. For other subclasses G of planar graphs, only an upper-bound is known for the list size k required for G to be flexibly k-choosable [6,18]; see [6] for a comprehensive overview and a discussion of the related results.…”
Section: W(v C)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, answering this question seems to be out of reach with current knowledge. Even for 2-degenerate graphs, the question seems rather tough, as it would imply the non-trivial result that planar graphs of girth 6 are flexibly 3-choosable, proven in [9], as this class of graphs is 2-degenerate.…”
Section: W(v C)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is optimal since there are triangle-free planar graphs that are not 3-choosable [5,11]. In [1] they show that planar graphs of girth at least six with an assignment of lists of size 3 are weighted ε-flexible. There is still a small gap left open since even planar graphs of girth at least 5 are 3-choosable [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%