2010
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1583015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexibility of Delivery Frequency in Logistics Competition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, Hise (1995) defended competition related to time is a strategic tool for creating competitive advantage in the logistics sector. Kramer and Kramer (2010) also highlighted the flexible delivery frequency and price in their study. In addition to operational factors, high consensus rates in the quality and marketing factors' statements obtained in the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, Hise (1995) defended competition related to time is a strategic tool for creating competitive advantage in the logistics sector. Kramer and Kramer (2010) also highlighted the flexible delivery frequency and price in their study. In addition to operational factors, high consensus rates in the quality and marketing factors' statements obtained in the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Considering the focus of the study, issues related to procurement and shipping logistics (inbound & outbound) were discussed principally. Kramer and Kramer (2010) analyzed the strategic impact of price and flexible delivery frequency on the competition among logistics service providers in the supply chain. They performed their studies according to time-based competition literature that deals with customers' selection of logistics service providers based on price and delivery times.…”
Section: Competition and Logisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the price-time competition research with delivery speed as a lever has been extensively studied (e.g., So 2000, Cachon andHarker 2002), the question of the optimal delivery frequency is a relatively under-explored one. Kraemer and Kraemer (2010) and Shah and Brueckner (2012) both model multiple customers, who select one exclusive manufacturer based on their proposed offering on price and delivery frequency. Specifically, Kraemer and Kraemer (2010) consider two manufacturers, one of which offers delivery frequency flexibility and show that the flexible manufacturer realizes less (more) profit than its counterpart if the customer inventory holding cost is low (high).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kraemer and Kraemer (2010) and Shah and Brueckner (2012) both model multiple customers, who select one exclusive manufacturer based on their proposed offering on price and delivery frequency. Specifically, Kraemer and Kraemer (2010) consider two manufacturers, one of which offers delivery frequency flexibility and show that the flexible manufacturer realizes less (more) profit than its counterpart if the customer inventory holding cost is low (high). Shah and Brueckner (2012) consider multiple manufacturers and show that the equilibrium delivery frequency increases in the number of customers and decreases in the number of competing manufacturers.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 In work carried out contemporaneously, Kramer and Kramer (2010) also study price and frequency competition between logistics services providers, using a related model. These authors in addition provide a road map to earlier work, which includes a detailed review by Minner (2003) of the inventorymanagement literature, where the analysis focuses on shipping decisions conditional on carrier prices, service levels and lead times while accounting for inventory holding costs.…”
Section: A Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%