2013
DOI: 10.1080/00207144.2013.729435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexibility in Processing Visual Information:Effects of Mood and Hypnosis

Abstract: This quasi-experiment using a real/simulator model investigated differences in cognitive flexibility in high and low hypnotizable participants. Using the variables of hypnotizability (low/high), consciousness (nonhypnotized/hypnotized), mood (happy/sad), and visual-information processing (global/local), reaction times and target detection paradigms of the subjects were evaluated during both nonhypnotic and hypnotic states. Flexibility in cognitive processing was operationalized as the ability to overcome the t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, there is the stage of psychological assessment, secondly, the educational stage during which the client is presented the concept of hypnosis (Enea & Dafinoiu, 2011), the third step consists in assessing hypnotisability (Enea & Dafinoiu, 2008;Enea & Dafinoiu, 2013), and the fourth stage is the practice of hypnosis and learning self-hypnosis.…”
Section: Therapy Progressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, there is the stage of psychological assessment, secondly, the educational stage during which the client is presented the concept of hypnosis (Enea & Dafinoiu, 2011), the third step consists in assessing hypnotisability (Enea & Dafinoiu, 2008;Enea & Dafinoiu, 2013), and the fourth stage is the practice of hypnosis and learning self-hypnosis.…”
Section: Therapy Progressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the first marker of improved performance, there is evidence that suggestion improves performance on tests of attentional orienting-namely, the Stroop and ANT (attention network test) (for a review, see Raz, 2005). Nevertheless, highly hypnotizable people differ at baseline on these tests, typically showing less efficient performance without suggestion (Dixon, Brunet, & Laurence, 1990;Dixon & Laurence, 1992;Raz, Shapiro, Fan, & Posner, 2002), though some studies show superior attentional performance and improved cognitive flexibility among highly susceptible individuals (see Crawford, 1994;Enea & Dafinoiu, 2013;Gruzelier, 1998).…”
Section: Object Orientationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preliminary support for this possibility comes from research showing that, relative to individuals with lower hypnotizability scores, individuals with higher hypnotizability scores (1) demonstrate stronger affective responses to violent films, 21 (2) are more likely to believe that a hypnotically suggested event had actually occurred, 2223 and (3) can find it more difficult to shift from negative to positive moods when moods are induced by negative images. 24 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%