2012
DOI: 10.7763/ijeeee.2012.v2.168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexibility Framework for Assessing Supplier Selection

Abstract: Abstract-This paper focuses on the electronic procurement marketplace and the selection of suppliers, aided by flexibility factors. By judiciously employing decision flexibility and the associated dynamic control amongst autonomous EPM nodes, improvements are possible. Empirical data for this study was collected from pharmaceutical organization in UK using a discrete choice interview and analyzed using grounded theory techniques. The importance of flexibility was highlighted and prioritized with respect to sup… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multi-attribute utility theory for the selection of suppliers Singhania and Gandhi (2013) Exploratory research through survey for the selection of suppliers Ageron et al 2013Analytical hierarchy process and METLAB Rathore and Agarwal 2016Multi attribute deterministic model for supplier selection Youssef et al (1996) Multi attribute selection model (MSM) Barla (2003) Multi-criteria classification for spare parts Roda et al (2014) Multiplicative analytical hierarchy process and multi-criteria decision-making method Yu and Hou (2016) Shipyard supply chain Vlachakis et al (2016) Multi criteria decision methods for electric supply planning in rural and remote areas Rojas-Zerpa and Yusta 2015Green supplier selection through AHP-TOPSIS Freeman and Chen (2015) Mathematical model for replenishment and supplier/transportation mode of selection Palak et al (2014) Selection of suppliers for automobile industry through questionnaire Sagar and Singh (2012) AHP used to solve various multi attribute decision for spare parts classification Braglia et al (2004) Fuzzy positive ideal rating used for supplier evaluation Hemalatha et al 2015Flexibility framework for assessing supplier selection Shirzad and Bell (2012) Quality criteria supporting supplier selection Abdolshah (2013) Supplier selection problem: methodology literature review Khurrum and Bhutta (2003) Supplier selection through AHP Mani et al (2014) Supplier selection through AHP and optimisation Umadevi et al (2012)…”
Section: Techniques/method/theme Investigatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-attribute utility theory for the selection of suppliers Singhania and Gandhi (2013) Exploratory research through survey for the selection of suppliers Ageron et al 2013Analytical hierarchy process and METLAB Rathore and Agarwal 2016Multi attribute deterministic model for supplier selection Youssef et al (1996) Multi attribute selection model (MSM) Barla (2003) Multi-criteria classification for spare parts Roda et al (2014) Multiplicative analytical hierarchy process and multi-criteria decision-making method Yu and Hou (2016) Shipyard supply chain Vlachakis et al (2016) Multi criteria decision methods for electric supply planning in rural and remote areas Rojas-Zerpa and Yusta 2015Green supplier selection through AHP-TOPSIS Freeman and Chen (2015) Mathematical model for replenishment and supplier/transportation mode of selection Palak et al (2014) Selection of suppliers for automobile industry through questionnaire Sagar and Singh (2012) AHP used to solve various multi attribute decision for spare parts classification Braglia et al (2004) Fuzzy positive ideal rating used for supplier evaluation Hemalatha et al 2015Flexibility framework for assessing supplier selection Shirzad and Bell (2012) Quality criteria supporting supplier selection Abdolshah (2013) Supplier selection problem: methodology literature review Khurrum and Bhutta (2003) Supplier selection through AHP Mani et al (2014) Supplier selection through AHP and optimisation Umadevi et al (2012)…”
Section: Techniques/method/theme Investigatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%