2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2004.06.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexibility-based upper bounds on the response variability of simple beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
28
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…material, geometric properties, soil properties, wind, wave, earthquake loads) exhibit non-Gaussian probabilistic characteristics. NonGaussian fields are also useful for the determination of spectral-distribution-free upper bounds of the response variability of stochastic systems [134]. In particular, the simulation of highly skewed narrow-banded stochastic processes and fields is well recognized today as a testbed that reveals the limitations of the existing simulation methods [34].…”
Section: Simulation Methods For Non-gaussian Stochastic Processes Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…material, geometric properties, soil properties, wind, wave, earthquake loads) exhibit non-Gaussian probabilistic characteristics. NonGaussian fields are also useful for the determination of spectral-distribution-free upper bounds of the response variability of stochastic systems [134]. In particular, the simulation of highly skewed narrow-banded stochastic processes and fields is well recognized today as a testbed that reveals the limitations of the existing simulation methods [34].…”
Section: Simulation Methods For Non-gaussian Stochastic Processes Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variant of MCS called ''fast MCS" has been recently used for the efficient numerical evaluation of the variability response function [165] needed to calculate spectral-probability distribution-free upper bounds of the response variability of structural systems [134]. Numerous other variants of this approach (importance sampling, subset simulation, line sampling) have been developed in the last decade especially for the efficient solution of reliability problems where the calculation of small failure probabilities requires a very large number of samples [161].…”
Section: Direct Mcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it is true that a consideration, which is similar to that given in this study, has also to be taken into account even when we deal with stochastic fields with a high degree of uncertainty, e.g., a non-Gaussian field having beta-distributions with lower bounds [20]. In these cases, the random sample data assume values much larger than 1.0, introducing greater discrepancy between (1 + f(x)) and 1/(1 + f(x)).…”
Section: Limitation Of Application and Further Interestmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A number of solution procedures for solving Equation (19) have been proposed addressing small-to-medium problems. However, as the problem size grows, such a solution can become quite challenging because of the enormous memory and computational resources required.…”
Section: Solution Of the Augmented Spectral Stochastic Finite Elementmentioning
confidence: 99%