2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-021-04048-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexibility and Rigidity in Steady Fluid Motion

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the number −6 is the second eigenvalue of the Laplace-Beltrami operator. Such symmetry results are proved in Constantin-Drivas-Ginsberg [15] for general Riemannian surfaces with Killing field, under the condition that F is larger than the smallest eigenvalue of the Laplace-Beltrami operator, which on the sphere amounts to F > −2. The symmetric structure of the sphere explains the improvement that we are able to obtain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Note that the number −6 is the second eigenvalue of the Laplace-Beltrami operator. Such symmetry results are proved in Constantin-Drivas-Ginsberg [15] for general Riemannian surfaces with Killing field, under the condition that F is larger than the smallest eigenvalue of the Laplace-Beltrami operator, which on the sphere amounts to F > −2. The symmetric structure of the sphere explains the improvement that we are able to obtain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This rigidity confers the idea that certain steady solutions adapt to the geometry and symmetries of the domain they occupy. Further results in this direction are given in [13,17].…”
Section: Euler Equations On a 2d Euclidean Domainmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This type of rigidity question has been very lately understood for different equations and different settings such as in the papers by Koch-Nadirashvili-Sverak [20] for Navier-Stokes, Hamel-Nadirashvili [16][17][18] for the 2D Euler equation on a strip, punctured disk or the full plane, Gómez-Serrano-Park-Shi-Yao [14] for the 2D Euler and modified SQG in the full plane and Constantin-Drivas-Ginsberg [8] for the 2D and 3D Euler, as well as the 2D Boussinesq and the 3D Magnetohydrostatic (MHS) equations.…”
Section: ω(X T) =mentioning
confidence: 99%