2019
DOI: 10.30880/jtet.2019.11.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fleiss’s Kappa: Assessing The Concept Of Technology Enabled Active Learning (Teal)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting Kappa values provide a measurable scale for the instrument's validity in assessing lecturer competencies in the OBE context. The expert agreement review formula using Fleiss Kappa coefficient (Davies & Fleiss, 1982;Hassan et al, 2019;Stemler, 2001) K = (Fa-Fc)/(N-Fc) K = Kappa Agreement Coefficient Value Fa = Agreement Units N = Transcription Units Fc = 50% of Expected Agreement…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting Kappa values provide a measurable scale for the instrument's validity in assessing lecturer competencies in the OBE context. The expert agreement review formula using Fleiss Kappa coefficient (Davies & Fleiss, 1982;Hassan et al, 2019;Stemler, 2001) K = (Fa-Fc)/(N-Fc) K = Kappa Agreement Coefficient Value Fa = Agreement Units N = Transcription Units Fc = 50% of Expected Agreement…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inter-rater reliability was calculated using Cohen’s Kappa for the resultant codes. Kappa for the initial coding was “very strong” (0.76) (Hassan et al , 2019). Both coders subsequently agreed the identification of the above three themes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To confirm the robustness of the research approach, Cohen's kappa was calculated (Hassan et al, 2019;Schwartz et al, 2019). Values of kappa range between 0 (complete disagreement) and 1 (complete agreement): values of >0.6 may be classified as "substantial" (Landis and Koch, 1977), 0.41-0.75 as "good" and >0.75 "very good" (Fleiss et al, 2003).…”
Section: Research Question Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%