2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fleeing from Hurricane Irma: Empirical Analysis of Evacuation Behavior Using Discrete Choice Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wong et al (2018) reviews hurricane evacuation behavioral modeling and developed RUM models for evacuation choices. Other hurricane evacuation work has extended these models by employing different distributions through a probit model (Solis et al, 2010), creating choice nesting structures through a nested logit (Mesa-Arango et al, 2013), including random parameters through a mixed logit (Sadri et al, 2014;Sarwar et al, 2018), developing dynamic models through a sequential logit (Fu and Wilmot, 2004;Fu et al, 2006), considering decisions as multi-dimensional and joint (Wong et al, 2020), or accounting for different lifestyle preferences through a latent class choice model for tsunamis (Urata and Pel, 2018) and wildfires (McCaffrey et al, 2018). Despite this work, models continue to focus on demographic variables, risk perceptions, or hazard characteristics, not choice attributes.…”
Section: Utility Maximization and Evacuation Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wong et al (2018) reviews hurricane evacuation behavioral modeling and developed RUM models for evacuation choices. Other hurricane evacuation work has extended these models by employing different distributions through a probit model (Solis et al, 2010), creating choice nesting structures through a nested logit (Mesa-Arango et al, 2013), including random parameters through a mixed logit (Sadri et al, 2014;Sarwar et al, 2018), developing dynamic models through a sequential logit (Fu and Wilmot, 2004;Fu et al, 2006), considering decisions as multi-dimensional and joint (Wong et al, 2020), or accounting for different lifestyle preferences through a latent class choice model for tsunamis (Urata and Pel, 2018) and wildfires (McCaffrey et al, 2018). Despite this work, models continue to focus on demographic variables, risk perceptions, or hazard characteristics, not choice attributes.…”
Section: Utility Maximization and Evacuation Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All scenarios assume that a Category 3 hurricane is approaching southeast Florida and that people living in Palm Beach, Broward, Miami-Dade, and Monroe Counties are ordered to evacuate. Based on studies of evacuation compliance and behavior in this region for Category 3+ hurricanes, we estimate that 48% of each county's population would evacuate 7,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Assuming that 19% of evacuees relocate elsewhere within their respective counties, this leads to a total of 2.3 million evacuees leaving the four affected counties 7,[16][17][18][19][20] .…”
Section: Full Model Simulations Of Hurricane Evacuation Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each scenario, evacuees were assigned to a different set of destination counties based on a list of 165 possible destinations across 26 states identified during post-Hurricane Irma surveys 7,17 . In the baseline scenario, evacuees were assigned to all 165 destination counties in proportion to observed evacuation choices during Hurricane Irma.…”
Section: Full Model Simulations Of Hurricane Evacuation Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations