2017
DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.1512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fledgling calls are a source of social information for conspecific, but not heterospecific, songbird territory selection

Abstract: Citation: Kelly, J. K., and K. A. Schmidt. 2017. Fledgling calls are a source of social information for conspecific, but not heterospecific, songbird territory selection. Ecosphere 8(2):e01512. 10.1002/ecs2.1512Abstract. The choice of breeding territory can strongly affect an individual's fitness. Individuals can use information obtained from social cues emitted by other organisms to assess territory quality when making settlement decisions. Social information sourced from cues indicating the current inhabitan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second-category singing mode may not be available to first-arriving males, and performance-based social cues will become more prevalent later in the season. As the breeding season progresses, individuals may switch to using other social cues more readily available later in the season, such as fledgling activity (Betts et al, 2008;Kelly & Schmidt, 2017) or postbreeding singing activity (Nocera et al, 2006;Betts et al, 2008;Farrell et al, 2012). These other social cues would be particularly useful to individuals prospecting for future breeding locations during the post-breeding season (e.g., Betts et al, 2008;Pärt et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second-category singing mode may not be available to first-arriving males, and performance-based social cues will become more prevalent later in the season. As the breeding season progresses, individuals may switch to using other social cues more readily available later in the season, such as fledgling activity (Betts et al, 2008;Kelly & Schmidt, 2017) or postbreeding singing activity (Nocera et al, 2006;Betts et al, 2008;Farrell et al, 2012). These other social cues would be particularly useful to individuals prospecting for future breeding locations during the post-breeding season (e.g., Betts et al, 2008;Pärt et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies consider signs of reproductive success as performance-based social cues (e.g., Brown et al, 2000;Betts et al, 2008;Kelly & Schmidt, 2017). These cues, however typically can only be sampled at the end of the breeding season and used after a one-year delay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The online version of this article (https ://doi.org/10.1007/s0044 2-020-04629 -5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Kelly and Schmidt 2017), and individual quality (Szymkowiak et al 2016) to adjust breeding site choices.…”
Section: Electronic Supplementary Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, breeding adults and their offspring often remain close (< 100 m) to their nest sites for less than 10 days after fledging (Streby and Andersen 2013;van Overveld et al 2017;Kysučan et al 2020). Therefore, the post-breeding social cues based on the density of adults and fledglings, or their proxies, such as fledgling call rates (Nocera et al 2006;Betts et al 2008;Kelly and Schmidt 2017) may be spatially accurate for only relatively short period of time. Another potential social cue that may be used for assessing habitat quality, even after breeding birds and fledglings have left an area, is presence and contents of old nest structures.…”
Section: Electronic Supplementary Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While begging calls of chicks serve as signals for the parents and siblings and (inadvertently) also as cues for heterospecific predators, it is unknown whether begging calls can also function as cues for non-kin conspecifics. What we know about the use of conspecific vocalizations as social information for breeders stems from studies focusing on the period after fledging (e.g., Kelly and Schmidt 2017;Waas et al 2005;Betts et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%