2020
DOI: 10.3389/fphy.2019.00228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flavor Techniques for LFV Processes: Higgs Decays in a General Seesaw Model

Abstract: Lepton flavor violating processes are optimal observables to test new physics, since they are forbidden in the Standard Model while they may be generated in new theories. The usual approach to these processes is to perform the computations in the physical basis; nevertheless this may lose track of the dependence on some of the fundamental parameters, in particular on those at the origin of the flavor violation. Consequently, in order to obtain analytical expressions directly in terms of these parameters, flavo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 See e.g., Refs. [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] for the rich phenomenologies of LFV couplings of the SM Higgs.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 See e.g., Refs. [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] for the rich phenomenologies of LFV couplings of the SM Higgs.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 are given in this appendix. We used the same calculation techniques as shown in [20,66]. We denote and .…”
Section: Appendix C: Analytic Formulas Of the One-loop Order For Decaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complex part arises from neutrinos and exotic leptons with different mixing mechanisms. With active neutrinos, we can solve their masses and oscillations using seesaw mechanisms [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] or otherwise [19][20][21][22], and with exotic leptons, we make different assumptions for large LFV effects, as given in Refs. [19,20,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations