Flavonolglykoside des Beifu� (Artemisia vulgaris L.), Estragon (Artemisia dracunculus L.) und Wermut (Artemisia absinthium L.)

Hoffmann, Bernd; Herrmann, Karl

doi:10.1007/bf01079976

Cited by 34 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Chumbalov et al (1969) Belenovskaya et al (1982) Apig = apigenin; Lute = luteolin; Chry = chrysoeriol; K = kaempferol; Q = quercetin; IR = isorhamnetin; Pat = patuletin; Spin = spinacetin; Qt = quercetagetin; Glc = glucose; Gal = galactose; Rut = rutinose; Glys = glycosides; Acyl = acylation. Hoffmann and Herrmann (1982) compared the flavonoid profiles of A. vulgaris, A. dracunculus, and A. absinthium.…”

Section: Flavonoid Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

Flavonoids of the Sunflower Family (Asteraceae)

Bohm

Stuessy

2001

119

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically those of translation, reprinting, re-use of illustrations, broadcasting, reproduction by photocopying machines or similar means, and storage in data banks. This book is dedicated to:Arthur Cronquist Outstanding plant systematist and major contributor to understanding taxonomic relationships within Asteraceae and Ralph E. Alston (1925Alston ( -1967) Visionary natural products chemist and geneticist who pioneered the use of chemical data in studies of plant systematics and evolution PrefaceCertainly many of the readers of this book will remember the early developments of chemosystematics in the late 1950s. We ourselves remember the excitement of these new data bearing on plant interrelationships. The hopes were high, the techniques were rapidly evolving, the quantities of data were large, and young workers were eagerly enthusiastic. Some even went so far as to predict that chemical data would soon replace morphological information as the basis for plant classification. These overly zealous predictions did not materialize, of course, as the history of plant systematics has amply shown during the past two centuries. If there is any distinct characteristic of systematics it is synthesis, as Lincoln Constance (1964) called it, the "unending synthesis." New tools generate new data and provide insights on additional dimensions of plant relationships. This will never change-we will continue to discover new tools and new data in the years ahead, and they will continue to be incorporated into the predictive general reference system of classification.The earlier efforts in chemosystematics focused on secondary plant products: alkaloids, betacyanins, carbohydrates, cyanogenic glycosides, glucosinolates, lipids, terpenoids, and especialiy flavonoids. The latter were particularly well suited for chemosystematic investigation for several reasons: ease of isolation and characterization, small amounts of plant material needed for analysis, stability of compounds especially through routine preparation of herbarium specimens, and low cost to obtain useful information. As a result of these considerable advantages, literally thousands of studies on use of flavonoids in plant systematics have been published. Although now with the present zest for macromolecular data from DNA restriction sites and sequences, there are fewer workers and laboratories dedicated to flavonoid chemosystematic studies; twenty years ago they were the new currency of exciting data in plant systematics.Because of many workers historically interested in the sunflower family, Asteraceae (or Compositae), in part due to its large size (approximately 23,000 species;Bremer, 1994), and because hundreds of flavonoid compounds were discovered in this family, many chemosystematic investigations have been completed on various taxa. Many studies came from the laboratories of R. A. Alston, B. L. Turner, and T. J. Mabry in the Department of Botany ...

show abstract

Section: Flavonoid Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

Flavonoids of the Sunflower Family (Asteraceae)

Bohm

Stuessy

2001

119

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…1016/j.livsci.2005.09.002 and Oriental folklore (Cosnier, 1989;Lee, 1975). Recent discoveries of important anti-oxidant, anticarcinogen, anti-malarial and anti-bacterial properties (Hoffmann and Herrmann, 1982;Lee et al, 1999) in wormwood have renewed interest in sourcing neutraceuticals from the plant (Kim and Lee, 1996;Twaij and Badr, 1988). However volatile compounds in wormwood like cineole and camphor (Muller, 1963;Schlattererr and Tisdale, 1969), which can inhibit the growth of neighboring plants have also limited the cultivation on farms for fodder (Kim et al, 1997).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 96%

“…Wormwood has a high concentration of essential oils and bioactive compounds such as camphor, cineole, catechol and vanillin (Hoffmann and Herrmann, 1982;Kim, 1996;Lee et al, 1999). Its medicinal and nutritional properties have been long recognized in traditional European 0301-6226/$ -see front matter D 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 96%

The effects of increasing the level of dietary wormwood (Artemisia montana Pampan) on intake, digestibility, N balance and ruminal fermentation characteristics in sheep

Kim¹,

Adesogan²,

Shin³

et al. 2006

Livestock Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Previous phytochemical studies revealed that A. absinthium contains essential oil, bitter sesquiterpenoid lactones, flavonoids, phenolic acids and lignans (Wichtl, 1994). Several flavonol-3-glycosides have been isolated from leaves of A. absinthium and identified as quercetin, isorhamnetin, patuletin and spinacetin derivates (Hoffmann and Herrmann, 1982). Artemisia absinthium extracts have demonstrated to possess a strong antiradical and antioxidant activity in vitro (Canadanovic-Brunet et al, 2005), as well as antiparasitic activity in animal model (Caner et al, 2008).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%