2019
DOI: 10.2166/hydro.2019.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flat vs. curved rigid-lid LES computations of an open-channel confluence

Abstract: This paper describes the application of four Large Eddy Simulations (LES) to an open-channel confluence flow, making use of a frictionless rigid-lid to treat the free-surface. Three simulations are conducted with a flat rigid-lid, at different elevations. A fourth simulation is carried out with a curved rigid-lid which is a closer approximation to the real free-surface of the flow. The curved rigid-lid is obtained from the time-averaged pressure field on the flat rigid-lid from one of the initial three simulat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Large eddy simulation (LES) was applied by Ramos et al ( 2019) [39] on four openchannel confluence flows through the using of a frictionless rigid-lid to treat the free-surface. The simulation was carried out on a flat rigid-lid for three of the confluences with different elevations while the fourth simulation was conducted on a curved rigid-lid which is closer to the true free surface flow, and the experimental data of Weber et al (2001) [16] were used.…”
Section: Asymmetrical Shapedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large eddy simulation (LES) was applied by Ramos et al ( 2019) [39] on four openchannel confluence flows through the using of a frictionless rigid-lid to treat the free-surface. The simulation was carried out on a flat rigid-lid for three of the confluences with different elevations while the fourth simulation was conducted on a curved rigid-lid which is closer to the true free surface flow, and the experimental data of Weber et al (2001) [16] were used.…”
Section: Asymmetrical Shapedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grading of the cell size is adopted, yielding a higher resolution in the confluence zone and a smooth transition between the different blocks. Our mesh sensitivity analysis shows that a coarser resolution than adopted in this paper will miss the secondary currents, like it is reported for another open-channel confluence in Ramos et al (2019a), and in open-channel flows in general, by Talebpour and Liu (2019). Therefore, special care was devoted to the mesh independence in terms of secondary flow results.…”
Section: Computational Meshmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…To treat the free surface, the rigid-lid approach will be adopted, implying that the free surface is replaced by a frictionless and impermeable upper boundary of the computational domain. More specifically, the curved rigid-lid approach described in Ramos et al (2019a) is adopted in the present work. The curved shape of the upper domain boundary is defined by the location of a virtual free surface which would cause a hydrostatic pressure field identical to the time-averaged pressure field predicted on a flat rigid-lid in a preceding LES simulation.…”
Section: Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part of the value of our results stems from the systematic comparison among the outcomes of many computations in various settings. Conversely, Ramos et al (2019) pointed out recently that a high mesh resolution remains necessary for 3‐D computations to capture secondary flows. As a consequence, conclusions requiring systematic comparisons could not have been reached based on a limited number of high‐resolution 3‐D simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%