2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flat plate thermal solar collector efficiency: Transient behavior under working conditions. Part I: Model description and experimental validation

Abstract: The efficiency of a solar collector is a key factor for the performance of thermal facilities. As the weather conditions vary continuously during the day, the instant collector efficiency depends not only on the components employed in its construction but also on the actual environmental conditions, the hot water temperature and aging. An experimental research was performed to describe the transient behavior of a flat plate collector field under outdoor working conditions. A transient collector model was assem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the research models, previous works have also proposed an overall heat loss coefficient and experimental generalized correlations as complements to determine the solar collector's efficiency [6][7][8][9]. However, these proposed models generally use a fixed inclination with respect to the N-S horizontal axis, according to the latitude of the evaluation place [10,11], thereby disregarding the fact that the second and third coefficients of the efficiency curve are functions of the U L .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the research models, previous works have also proposed an overall heat loss coefficient and experimental generalized correlations as complements to determine the solar collector's efficiency [6][7][8][9]. However, these proposed models generally use a fixed inclination with respect to the N-S horizontal axis, according to the latitude of the evaluation place [10,11], thereby disregarding the fact that the second and third coefficients of the efficiency curve are functions of the U L .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(7)). However, this latter method does not give an accurate indication of the real solar loop performance as stated in studies by Rodruguez-Hidalgo, Rodríguez-Aumente, Lecuona, Gutiérrez-Urueta, Ventas [22] and Sabatelli, Marano, Braccio, Sharma [23]; therefore, the results obtained by the ISO standard and by the direct method differ in most cases. The standard method can be used for evaluation of the solar collectors' performance in a steady-state condition, while in a transient condition the direct method is more appropriate for the efficiency calculation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In the research, only the solar radiation data above 400 Wm -2 have been considered. As stated by researchers [22,23], using the lower solar radiation data for the efficiency calculations gives an inaccurate evaluation of the system's performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the controller design, a mathematical model is created by performing an energy balance in each solar collector and in the generator. Equation (1) shows the output temperature T S of the generator with regard to time [50]. This dynamic equation is maintained as a function of the working fluid mass flowṁ of each solar collector, considering constant properties as the density ρ f = 998.2 kg/m 3 , specific heat C p f = 4182 j/kg K and the tank volume ∀ T = 0.180 m 3 .…”
Section: Layer 1: Fuzzy Control Of Solar Collector Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%