2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-22668-2_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flat Design vs Traditional Design: Comparative Experimental Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stickel et al [23] investigated the implications of skeuomorphic vs. flat design for interface design and their findings suggest that flat design must tackle the problem of missing information due to simplification and should put careful focus on the semantics of the used elements. In addition, Burmistrov et al [24] stated that, according to their study, flat design means higher cognitive load, longer performance times and more errors and should be reconsidered using research findings and [25], in an eye tracking experiment comparing different kinds of clickability clues, argued that flat UI elements attract less attention and cause uncertainty due to weak signifiers that required more user effort. Zhang et al [26] concluded that, in their experimental study, skeuomorphic icons had higher identification accuracy and faster efficiency than flat icons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stickel et al [23] investigated the implications of skeuomorphic vs. flat design for interface design and their findings suggest that flat design must tackle the problem of missing information due to simplification and should put careful focus on the semantics of the used elements. In addition, Burmistrov et al [24] stated that, according to their study, flat design means higher cognitive load, longer performance times and more errors and should be reconsidered using research findings and [25], in an eye tracking experiment comparing different kinds of clickability clues, argued that flat UI elements attract less attention and cause uncertainty due to weak signifiers that required more user effort. Zhang et al [26] concluded that, in their experimental study, skeuomorphic icons had higher identification accuracy and faster efficiency than flat icons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, during the longer operational phase in which the needle insertions are executed and monitored, shorter saccades were more prevalent with A1. Saccade amplitudes depend on the type of task (Goldberg et al, 2002) and whereas longer saccades are indicators of efficient and directed search, shorter saccades imply focal processing and conscious analysis of visual information (Burmistrov et al, 2015). Whereas during early encounter with the SI the users are expected to find relevant information efficiently, the operation phase requires focused attention for issuing task related commands and monitoring the consequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, they have a "flat" look without any textures, decorations, shadows, or three-dimensional elements. Flat design became popular in mobile UI and icon design [18] and despite of the fact that study results shows a higher cognitive load for searching flat icons [19], we stick to flat design in the first appraoch since we have use cases in mind, where the comics are incoporated into mobile applications. Table 1 gives an overview of the shapes we selected to reflect the different types of elements in the Quantified Self PROV model [6].…”
Section: Shapesmentioning
confidence: 99%