Abstract:Rationale:Flashbulb memories are detailed and vivid memories of attributes of the reception context of surprising and emotionally arousing public events.Patient concerns and diagnosis:This paper offers a fine-grained view of flashbulb memories in a patient with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD).Interventions:The patient underwent a directed interview about the 13 November 2015 attacks in Paris.Outcomes:Unlike her memory about the date and month of the attacks, the patient provided accurate information about the ye… Show more
“…The two memories were presented in random order and counterbalanced across participants. This memory recall protocol was based on procedures used to evaluate flashbulb memories (Conway et al, 1994; El Haj et al, 2016). Further details about the memory recall procedure are available online (https://osf.io/x7z4f/).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, participants were asked to recall a personally important school-related memory and then answered 15 questions concerning the event (e.g., “How easily do you remember who you were with when this event happened?”). These memory recall questions, adapted from flashbulb memory research (Conway et al, 1994; El Haj et al, 2016), are available online (https://osf.io/x7z4f/). After recalling the personal memory, participants carried out the shooter task used in Study 3.…”
Twenty years after 9/11, the impact of terrorism on social and political attitudes remains unclear. Several large-scale surveys suggest that terrorism has no discernible effects on direct, self-report measures of prejudice toward Arab-Muslims. However, direct measures may lack the sensitivity to detect subtle underlying attitudes that are considered socially unacceptable to openly express. To tap these subtle reactions, we assessed more sensitive and implicit measures of the cognitive–affective aspects of prejudice. Building on the justification–suppression model of prejudice, we hypothesized that terrorist attacks increase implicit bias toward Arab-Muslims, especially among individuals who are unable to regulate automatic hostile reactions due to personality or situational variables. Study 1, using data from Project Implicit (N = 276,311), showed that terrorist attacks increased implicit bias but not expressed prejudice toward Arab-Muslims. Study 2, using data from Google Trends, showed that terrorist attacks increased anti-Islamic searches on the internet. Four studies that collected original data (total N = 851) showed that the effects of reminders of terrorism on anti-Islamic implicit bias are moderated by individual differences in prejudice and automaticity (Studies 3–4), by the strength of implicit Muslim–terrorist associations (Study 5), and by momentary self-control depletion (Study 6). Overall, the present research indicates that despite little evidence for elevated overt expression of prejudice against Arab-Muslims following terrorist attacks, terrorist attacks increase anti-Islamic implicit bias whenever individuals are unlikely to control automatic hostile reactions.
“…The two memories were presented in random order and counterbalanced across participants. This memory recall protocol was based on procedures used to evaluate flashbulb memories (Conway et al, 1994; El Haj et al, 2016). Further details about the memory recall procedure are available online (https://osf.io/x7z4f/).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, participants were asked to recall a personally important school-related memory and then answered 15 questions concerning the event (e.g., “How easily do you remember who you were with when this event happened?”). These memory recall questions, adapted from flashbulb memory research (Conway et al, 1994; El Haj et al, 2016), are available online (https://osf.io/x7z4f/). After recalling the personal memory, participants carried out the shooter task used in Study 3.…”
Twenty years after 9/11, the impact of terrorism on social and political attitudes remains unclear. Several large-scale surveys suggest that terrorism has no discernible effects on direct, self-report measures of prejudice toward Arab-Muslims. However, direct measures may lack the sensitivity to detect subtle underlying attitudes that are considered socially unacceptable to openly express. To tap these subtle reactions, we assessed more sensitive and implicit measures of the cognitive–affective aspects of prejudice. Building on the justification–suppression model of prejudice, we hypothesized that terrorist attacks increase implicit bias toward Arab-Muslims, especially among individuals who are unable to regulate automatic hostile reactions due to personality or situational variables. Study 1, using data from Project Implicit (N = 276,311), showed that terrorist attacks increased implicit bias but not expressed prejudice toward Arab-Muslims. Study 2, using data from Google Trends, showed that terrorist attacks increased anti-Islamic searches on the internet. Four studies that collected original data (total N = 851) showed that the effects of reminders of terrorism on anti-Islamic implicit bias are moderated by individual differences in prejudice and automaticity (Studies 3–4), by the strength of implicit Muslim–terrorist associations (Study 5), and by momentary self-control depletion (Study 6). Overall, the present research indicates that despite little evidence for elevated overt expression of prejudice against Arab-Muslims following terrorist attacks, terrorist attacks increase anti-Islamic implicit bias whenever individuals are unlikely to control automatic hostile reactions.
“…Finally, as emotion may modulate memory in AD (e.g., El Haj, Gandolphe, & Wawrziczny, & Antoine, 2016; Kalenzaga, Bugaïska, & Clarys, 2013), future research should evaluate the emotional valence of the word- and object-cues to see if this influences recall. It may be that object cues by nature are more personal relevant to the participants, and thus carry higher positive valence, which may lead to better recall.…”
Older adults diagnosed with AD demonstrate increased recollection of personal semantic and episodic events from the remote past relative to the recent one. The findings are discussed in relation to prominent models of memory consolidation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
Flashbulb memories are autobiographical memories for important and emotional events, which have the particularity of being at the intersection of personal and public events. Autobiographical memory impairments are highly prevalent in schizophrenia, a psychiatric condition intrinsically linked to self-disorders. Thus, we aimed to evaluate flashbulb and event memory functioning in individuals with schizophrenia. Twenty-four individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia and 25 control participants were tested on a flashbulb memory questionnaire about the July 14th, 2016, Nice (France) terrorist attack, including questions on flashbulb and event memory, certainty, vividness, rehearsal, emotion, novelty, consequentiality, implication, and importance. Participants also underwent cognitive assessments. Analysis showed lower scores for both flashbulb and event memories in patients compared to control participants. Subjective ratings of the phenomenological characteristics of flashbulb memory were similar between the two groups overall. However, individuals with schizophrenia reported having higher levels of emotion when they first learned about the attack compared to the control group. Our results replicate findings of impaired autobiographical memory functioning in schizophrenia and extend these findings to public events. Our findings also indicate that flashbulb memories may lead to substantial contextual recall in schizophrenia patients and that collective memories, such as a terrorist attack, can have a profound emotional impact on patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.