2019
DOI: 10.1007/s13197-019-03872-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flash Profile as an effective method for assessment of odor profile in three different fishes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The flash profile, a modern sensory profiling technique, is a combination of collecting of attributes and sorting, based on the simultaneous introduction of all the samples to be assessed, which allows a rapid sensory profile with high discriminatory capability become possible, obtaining a considerable amount and variety of attributes (Delarue & Sieffermann, 2004 ; Marques et al, 2019 ). As shown in Figure 2b , samples H (PNK1), B (PK1), and I (SK1) were significantly difference from samples L (PK2), F (PK3), C (PK4), E (SK2), J (SK3), D (SK4), G (PNK4), K (PNK2), and A (PNK3) because the proportion of KGM was insufficient, which indicated that the optimal amount of KGM could significantly change the overall sensory properties of the gel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The flash profile, a modern sensory profiling technique, is a combination of collecting of attributes and sorting, based on the simultaneous introduction of all the samples to be assessed, which allows a rapid sensory profile with high discriminatory capability become possible, obtaining a considerable amount and variety of attributes (Delarue & Sieffermann, 2004 ; Marques et al, 2019 ). As shown in Figure 2b , samples H (PNK1), B (PK1), and I (SK1) were significantly difference from samples L (PK2), F (PK3), C (PK4), E (SK2), J (SK3), D (SK4), G (PNK4), K (PNK2), and A (PNK3) because the proportion of KGM was insufficient, which indicated that the optimal amount of KGM could significantly change the overall sensory properties of the gel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A whole set of twelve different formulated samples (PNK3, PK1, PK4, SK4, SK2, PK3, PNK4, PNK1, SK1, SK3, PNK2, PK2 labeled with letters A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, respectively) were presented simultaneously for each participant. They were required to rank the intensity of these samples for each attribute via applying an unstructured and anchored scale of 9 cm based on the “low” and “high” extremes (Albert et al, 2011 ; Marques et al, 2019 ). The ranking data were collected using the questionnaire shown in Appendix 1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it is known that material size and quantity play a major role in protecting highly perishable fish and fish products. In fact, rancidity and generation of free fatty acids are usually common drawbacks of fish oil and other fish products [104]. Thus, to overcome such problems, microencapsulation using marine polysaccharides played an important part.…”
Section: Overview Of the Biopolymers Used For Electrospun Fibresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, it is difficult to obtaining consensus on particular attributes (Ares & Varela, 2016; Hopfer & Heymann, 2013; Worch, Lê, & Punter, 2010). However, in the last decades there have been alternative descriptive methods performed by consumers, namely Free‐Choice Profiling (FCP), Flash Profile (FP) and Check‐All‐That‐Apply (CATA), due to other advantages such as a rapid sensory profile assessment and reduced cost and time, (Marques, Lise, Bonadimann, & Mitterer‐Daltoé, 2019; Mello, Almeida, & Melo, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%