1994
DOI: 10.1038/eye.1994.159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flash and pattern visual evoked potentials in the diagnosis and monitoring of dysthyroid optic neuropathy

Abstract: SUMMARYFlash and pattern visual evoked potentials were recorded in 8 patients (13 eyes) with dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON), diagnosed using the American Thyroid Associ ation classification. All were treated with systemic ster oids, but 4 patients (6 eyes) also required orbital decompression. Flash YEP (P2) and pattern YEP (PI00) were recorded prior to and 2 weeks after commencing steroid treatment or decompression. Fifteen patients with Graves orbitopathy but without DON, and 20 healthy subjects, acted as … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

5
39
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While Tsaloumas and co-workers reported on immediate mean latency recovery 2 weeks after orbital decompression in seven eyes with DON using pattern-reversed stimuli, Setälä and associates observed indiscriminate mean flash-evoked cortical response latencies after 7 years of follow-up in seven patients 10 11. This is in line with our findings after a mean follow-up of 10 months: latencies did not reveal significant regeneration and even deteriorated in some patients after bony orbital decompression.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While Tsaloumas and co-workers reported on immediate mean latency recovery 2 weeks after orbital decompression in seven eyes with DON using pattern-reversed stimuli, Setälä and associates observed indiscriminate mean flash-evoked cortical response latencies after 7 years of follow-up in seven patients 10 11. This is in line with our findings after a mean follow-up of 10 months: latencies did not reveal significant regeneration and even deteriorated in some patients after bony orbital decompression.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Tsaloumas et al compared pattern- and flash-evoked VECP during radiation and decompression therapy and concluded that there were no substantial differences between the techniques 11. However pattern-evoked VECP may be affected by patient compliance, media opacity or blurred vision primarily impairing amplitude potentials, while latencies remain unaffected or may be compromised to a much lesser extent as long as retinal luminance remains unaffected 11 20. Although our patients underwent systemic steroid treatment, significant cataract formation during the VECP follow-up period was not observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 In this study VEPs were performed in less then a third of patients, reflecting variation in facilities rather that the efficacy of the test. Results were abnormal in 8 out of 11 definite cases of DON.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study by Neigel et al 1 involving 58 patients with DON, 64% had abnormal color vision and 66% had abnormal fi elds, whereas the pattern VEP was abnormal in 94%. Tsaloumas et al 22 studied 13 eyes of eight patients with DON and found abnormal VEP before treatment in all 13 eyes, with a signifi cant improvement after treatment with high-dose steroids or surgical decompression. The authors concluded that VEP to fl ash and pattern stimuli provides a useful diagnostic and monitoring tool in patients with DON.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%