2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2020.04.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1) as a novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for gastric cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, microarray technology, together with integrated bioinformatics analysis, has been performed to identify novel genes related to various diseases that might act as diagnostic and prognostic biological markers (10)(11)(12)(13)(14). For example, the expression of FFAR2, also known as GPR43, in AMI patients has been found to be notably lower than in the controls, and low levels of FFAR2 expression in peripheral blood was confirmed as an independent risk predictor for AMI, with an odds ratio of 6.308 (15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, microarray technology, together with integrated bioinformatics analysis, has been performed to identify novel genes related to various diseases that might act as diagnostic and prognostic biological markers (10)(11)(12)(13)(14). For example, the expression of FFAR2, also known as GPR43, in AMI patients has been found to be notably lower than in the controls, and low levels of FFAR2 expression in peripheral blood was confirmed as an independent risk predictor for AMI, with an odds ratio of 6.308 (15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unexpectedly, UALCAN database showed that FEN1 levels were significantly lower in stage I BC than in normal and stage II BC. Zhao et al reported that FEN1 expression was higher in stage I gastric cancer tissues (n=56) than in normal tissues (36). The ATCG database showed no significant difference in FEN1 expression between stage I and stage II BC tissues (22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Zhao et al. reported that FEN1 expression was higher in stage I gastric cancer tissues (n=56) than in normal tissues ( 36 ). The ATCG database showed no significant difference in FEN1 expression between stage I and stage II BC tissues ( 22 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we aimed to analyze the relationship of MAL2 with clinical features and its significance on the survival of patients with breast cancer, the median expression value of MAL2 was applied as a cut-off value for further analysis according to the previous studies [18][19][20][21].…”
Section: E Verification Of Mal2 By Qrt-pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%