Flanker negative priming from spatially unpredictable primes: An ERP study

Gibbons, Henning; Frings, Christian

doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.01.004

Cited by 8 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Thus, a stimulus can be "newer than new" if it recently has been ignored, which may reflect below-baseline activation of the respective stimulus representation at probe onset. The present findings hence add to several electro-physiological studies (Daurignac et al, 2006;Gibbons and Frings, 2010;Frings and Groh-Bordin, 2007;Hinojosa et al, 2009) that seemed to support persisting-inhibition view of negative priming (e.g., Tipper, 2001).…”

Section: Two or Three Levels Of Factors Target Familiarity And Contexsupporting

confidence: 84%

“…1 This concept of phasic context underlies the manipulation of context strength by means of distractor familiarity in the present task (see below). Recent work indeed showed effects of prime-probe distractortarget shifts on N400 in a simple digit flanker task (Gibbons, 2009;Gibbons and Frings, 2010). The present study expands on these findings by employing a comprehensive set of priming conditions, realizing all seven meaningful combinations of familiarity with probe target and distractor stimuli from the prime.…”

Section: Introductionsupporting

confidence: 57%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A mid-central N450 component of the ERP distinguishes trial-by-trial effects of target familiarity and context strength

Gibbons

2011

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Two or Three Levels Of Factors Target Familiarity And Contexsupporting

confidence: 84%

Section: Introductionsupporting

confidence: 57%

A mid-central N450 component of the ERP distinguishes trial-by-trial effects of target familiarity and context strength

Gibbons

2011

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…On each display, a stimulus triplet was presented (e.g., JKJ or 5M5), with the centrally presented stimulus as target and the first and third stimuli as flanking distractors. To reduce spatial selection of the target (Gibbons & Frings, 2010), the stimulus triplets were presented randomly at one of four possible positions on the screen (left, right, above, or below the fixation cross). Hence, the positions of the stimulus triplets either repeated (25% of all trials) or changed (75% of all trials) from prime to probe; however, this factor did not interact with the factors of interest and was not incorporated into the analyses.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor–response bindings

2011

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Distractor inhibition and distractor-response binding were investigated in two experiments by analyzing distractor repetition benefits and their interaction with response repetition effects in a sequential-priming paradigm. Distractor repetition benefits were larger for distractors that were incompatible with the to-be-executed response (task-related distractors) than for distractors that were not assigned to a response (neutral distractors), indicating that the strength of distractor inhibition was a function of response interference for the distractors. In contrast, the distractor-response bindings were found to be of equal strength for both task-related and neutral distractors. Thus, differences in the strengths of distractor inhibition did not affect the integration of distractors with responses into event files. Instead, our results suggest that distractor-response binding and distractor inhibition are independent mechanisms that are recruited for the automatization of behavior and action control.

show abstract

“…The underlying processes were discussed as reflecting processes related to perceived prime-probe-similarity (Behrendt et al, 2010). Gibbons (2009) noticed a specific effect of NP on the N400 and Gibbons and Frings (2010) found an IR specific late P3 complex in a NP task with spatial uncertainty.…”

Section: What Are the Neural And Electrophysiological Correlates Of Np?mentioning

confidence: 99%

The negative priming paradigm: An update and implications for selective attention

2015

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Negative Priming (NP) is an influential paradigm in cognitive psychology that was originally developed to measure attentional selection. Yet, up to the mid-1990s, a large number of experimental reports questioned whether the NP effect is based on attentional inhibition and/or episodic retrieval processes. In this review, we summarize findings since the mid1990s and discuss new and old theoretical approaches to Negative Priming. We conclude that more than one process contributes to NP and that future research should analyze the conditions under which a particular process contributes to NP. Moreover, we argue that the paradigm -although it does not measure a single cognitive process alone -is still a useful tool for understanding selection in cognition. In fact, it might be a virtue of the paradigm that several cognitive processes work here together as selection in nonexperimental contexts is surely a multidimensional process. From this perspective, research on NP is relevant for all research fields analyzing selection. We therefore close our review by discussing the implications of the new evidence on NP for theories of selective attention.

show abstract

Flanker negative priming from spatially unpredictable primes: An ERP study

Cited by 8 publications

References 44 publications

A mid-central N450 component of the ERP distinguishes trial-by-trial effects of target familiarity and context strength

A mid-central N450 component of the ERP distinguishes trial-by-trial effects of target familiarity and context strength

Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor–response bindings

The negative priming paradigm: An update and implications for selective attention

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About