2014
DOI: 10.1080/03602559.2013.844827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flame-Retardant Performance of Polystyrene Enhanced by Polyphenylene Oxide and Intumescent Flame Retardant

Abstract: Polyphenylene oxide and the intumescent flame retardant were used in combination to achieve the fire-retardancy of polystyrene. The IFR system is mainly composed of ammonium polyphosphate, pentaerythritol and melamine. To solve the problems existed in the ternary IFR system, such as hydrophilicity and heterogeneity in particle size and mixing, IFR powders were surface modified by silane coupling agent KH-550 via wet ball milling. The results showed that the combination of PPO and IFR could effectively enhance … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(25 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the addition of 22% IFR, the LOI value of PS‐22%IFR sample is increased to 27.2% and burning duration is decreased to 137 s. With the increased IFR content, the LOI value rises to 27.7%, the combustion time is further shortened to 52 s (PS‐27%IFR). One can see from Table 2 and Figure 4 that all the PS‐IFR samples cannot pass any ratings in UL‐94 tests because of the molten dripping problem, which is consistent with the published results, 34 showing the limited flame retardant efficiency of traditional IFR system.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…With the addition of 22% IFR, the LOI value of PS‐22%IFR sample is increased to 27.2% and burning duration is decreased to 137 s. With the increased IFR content, the LOI value rises to 27.7%, the combustion time is further shortened to 52 s (PS‐27%IFR). One can see from Table 2 and Figure 4 that all the PS‐IFR samples cannot pass any ratings in UL‐94 tests because of the molten dripping problem, which is consistent with the published results, 34 showing the limited flame retardant efficiency of traditional IFR system.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The other is that the PPO has a certain degree of self‐extinguishing properties, but the addition of combustible PS/HIPS resin significantly reduces the flame retardant properties of PPO blends. As it was reported, 20 PPO with a 60 wt% loading of HIPS could not reach V‐0 rating in UL‐94 test, and the LOI value just reached 21.7%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Even though PPO possesses many promising properties and a competitive price, the melt viscosity of PPO is extremely high due to its chain rigidity. 19 In order to increase the fluidity of PPO, various polymers such as polystyrene (PS), 20,21 high impact PS (HIPS), [22][23][24] polyamide (PA), 25 poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT), 26 and liquid crystal polymers (LCP) 27 have been introduced to reduce its viscosity. A direct melt blending of two polymers generally results in poor mechanical properties because of poor dispersion and lack of adequate interfacial adhesion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a typical sub-factor in mechanochemistry [ 36 ], ball milling has been developed for crushing, mixing, and reacting, due to the impact and shear forces generated by high-speed rotation and high-temperature surroundings [ 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 ]. It is widely used in fabricating flame retardants, for its superior properties of easy processing, low cost, and large-scale production [ 39 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%