1992
DOI: 10.1177/104239159200400201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flame Extinguishment Properties of Dry Chemicals: Extinction Weights for Small Diffusion Pan Fires and Additional Evidence for Flame Extinguishment by Thermal Mechanisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the particle size was also found to be negatively correlated with the extinguishing time. This result agrees well with the fact that the particle size of suppressants generally governs their fire-extinguishing ability [28]; also, it suggests that the extinguishing time and dispersion stability might be improved by using smaller ferrocene particles. However, a comparison between the extinguishing times of S1 ferrocene/surfynol 465 and S1 ferrocene/ DTAC dispersions demonstrated that the surfactant had little influence on extinguishing time in this study; furthermore, systematically investigating the influence of the surfactant on the extinction ability using a large variety of surfactants is necessary.…”
Section: Fire Suppression Experimentssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In addition, the particle size was also found to be negatively correlated with the extinguishing time. This result agrees well with the fact that the particle size of suppressants generally governs their fire-extinguishing ability [28]; also, it suggests that the extinguishing time and dispersion stability might be improved by using smaller ferrocene particles. However, a comparison between the extinguishing times of S1 ferrocene/surfynol 465 and S1 ferrocene/ DTAC dispersions demonstrated that the surfactant had little influence on extinguishing time in this study; furthermore, systematically investigating the influence of the surfactant on the extinction ability using a large variety of surfactants is necessary.…”
Section: Fire Suppression Experimentssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…(W/W )s8 = 2.275-1.270 X (3) where (W/Wg~sis the extinction weight ratio (2.32 m 2 pari) for the small-particle fraction, (< 38/am) without carrier; W is the real extinction weight (2.32 m 2 pan) for the (< 38/am) fraction, g/m2; W is the latent extinetion weight (2.32 m 2 pan) for the (< . Later in the article, we will use Equation 9 to predict the large-pan extinction ratio for any carrier extinguishant combination where the extinguishant fraction is equal to, or greater than, that of the aerodynamically optimal fraction.…”
Section: Experimental Extinction Ratio Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 The selected values of S in Table 2 were those that gare the highest degree of data correlation. Limit sizes for the same dry chemicals observed in small pan studies z3 are included in Table 2 for comparison.…”
Section: S C a L L N G F A C T O R Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Krasnyansky [3] assessed the fire suppression performance of mixedphase agents of 5 μm ABC dry powder and nitrogen in combination with halon 2402 in a 100 m 3 chamber and a tunnel with a length of 180 m and a cross section of 3 m 2 . Ewing [4] studied the extinguishing performance of several kinds of dry powder using n-heptane diffusion flame in a 422-liter chamber. Adam [5] examined the performance of non-pyrotechnically generated aerosols fire suppressants in an 8 m 3 chamber.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%