1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf01041422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flame extinguishment properties of dry chemicals: Extinction concentrations for small diffusion pan fires

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
5

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
18
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimal small-particle fraction we observed behaved as it should for an aerodynamic effect and acted independently of the chemical type and density of the cartier and of both the type and physical size--if below 38 p m --o f the transported particles. As shown in Figure 4, the optimal proportion of any combination of can-ier and extinguishant substances included in this study (except for a Monnex carrier with reactive particle sizes above 38 pm) can be estimated from: (2) where X A is the optimal small-particle fraction for any extinguishant powder (0 to 38, 0 to 30, or 0 to 20 pm); S is the weight-mean particle size of the carrier powder, SA= J S dX; X is the weight fraction of the carrier particle at each particle size; and S is sieve size of particles. Monnex.…”
Section: Aerodynamic Drag and Optimal Flame Extingui Hing Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal small-particle fraction we observed behaved as it should for an aerodynamic effect and acted independently of the chemical type and density of the cartier and of both the type and physical size--if below 38 p m --o f the transported particles. As shown in Figure 4, the optimal proportion of any combination of can-ier and extinguishant substances included in this study (except for a Monnex carrier with reactive particle sizes above 38 pm) can be estimated from: (2) where X A is the optimal small-particle fraction for any extinguishant powder (0 to 38, 0 to 30, or 0 to 20 pm); S is the weight-mean particle size of the carrier powder, SA= J S dX; X is the weight fraction of the carrier particle at each particle size; and S is sieve size of particles. Monnex.…”
Section: Aerodynamic Drag and Optimal Flame Extingui Hing Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the study did not report the ranges of particle sizes present in the Purple-K employed in these experiments and the powder-delivery system did not perform satisfactorily. The studies of Birchall (1970), Ewing et al (1989b), Ewing et al (1992), Beda et al (1993), and Mitani (1983 have concluded that initial particle size is a key parameter influencing the critical conditions of extinction of laminar premixed flames, turbulent premixed flames and turbulent diffusion flames. Dodding et al (1970) have reported on the amount of NaHCO J required in the oxidizer stream to extinguish counterflow methane-air diffusion flames.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…ders may be suitable replacements for halons. Very few well-controlled laboratory experiments have been conducted previously to evaluate the effectiveness of dry powders in extinguishing flames (Ewing et al, 1989b;Ewing et al, 1992;Birchall 1970;Dodding et al, 1970;Milne et al, 1970). Milne et al (1970) compared the effectiveness of Purple-K (KHCO J powder) in extinguishing counterflow methane-air diffusion flames with that of CFJBr.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An experiment has been conducted by Curtis T. Ewing, the leading author, to study the relations between the particle size of dry chemicals and the extinguishment of Class B n‐heptane fire by K 3 HCO 3 , NH 4 H 2 PO 4 , Na 2 B 4 O 7 ·10H 2 O, (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 , K 2 CO 3 , K 4 Fe(CN) 6 ·3H 2 O, Na 2 CO 3 , K 2 SO 4 , NaCl, Na 2 C 2 O 4 , K 2 C 2 O 4 ·H 2 O, and Monnex . It finds out that the smaller the sizes of the particles are, the more effective they will be in fire extinguishment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%