2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtusci.2015.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flame atomic absorption determination of zirconium in glass and refractory bricks after coprecipitation with aluminium hydroxide

Abstract: A simple preconcentration method for zirconium based on coprecipitation with aluminium hydroxide prior to flame atomic absorption (FAAS) determination was established. The recovery values of the analyte ions were higher than 95%. Such parameters as the type of hydroxide ion source for precipitation, type of acid for the dissolution step, amount of Al 3+ ion as the collector, pH, temperature, standing time and centrifuge time were optimized using 50 mL of a solution containing 150 g of zirconium. The effect of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is not recommended to determine zirconium by the electrothermal atomization method because heat-resistant carbides and oxides of zirconium are formed in the graphite furnace (Burylin et al 2011). The most sensitive analytical line for zirconium is at 360.12 nm, and this line is used in a few methods presented in Table 4 (Fifth Commission Directive 93/73/EEC, 1999; Yadav, Bhowmik & Sikder, 2012;Afzali et al, 2014;Shokrollahi & Gohari, 2017). To reduce the detection limit of zirconium to 44 μg•l −1 , Afzali et al (2014) used the preliminary microextraction of analyte as a ternary complex with fluoride ions and the 2-(5-bromo-2-pyridylazo)-5-diethylaminophenol (5-Br-PADAP).…”
Section: Methods Of Atomic Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not recommended to determine zirconium by the electrothermal atomization method because heat-resistant carbides and oxides of zirconium are formed in the graphite furnace (Burylin et al 2011). The most sensitive analytical line for zirconium is at 360.12 nm, and this line is used in a few methods presented in Table 4 (Fifth Commission Directive 93/73/EEC, 1999; Yadav, Bhowmik & Sikder, 2012;Afzali et al, 2014;Shokrollahi & Gohari, 2017). To reduce the detection limit of zirconium to 44 μg•l −1 , Afzali et al (2014) used the preliminary microextraction of analyte as a ternary complex with fluoride ions and the 2-(5-bromo-2-pyridylazo)-5-diethylaminophenol (5-Br-PADAP).…”
Section: Methods Of Atomic Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various techniques are available in the literature for the determination of zirconium covering a wide range of concentrations. They include gravimetry, 3 wavelength dispersive X-ray fluorescence (WDXRF) spectrometry, 4,5 total reflection X-ray fluorescence (TXRF), 6 spectrophotometry, 7,8 ICP-AES, 9 AAS 10 etc. Among the available techniques, gravimetry and spectrophotometry methods are cumbersome and time-consuming methods and, therefore, are not preferred choices for reporting the results of process stream solutions where they are to be reported rapidly for taking decisions on downstream processing and also monitoring the zirconium extraction process on a real-time basis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%