2017
DOI: 10.1177/2167479517734851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flag on the Play

Abstract: This study examines the presence of journalistic antapologia (JA) in newspaper-reported sports apologies over a 5-year period (2010–2015). Results from this analysis offer a comprehensive assessment of the current landscape of JA in sports journalism, specifically, by rhetorically analyzing the kategoria and apologia that combine to trigger an antapologic response. A new presence categorization for JA is offered by examining the role enactment of adversarial journalism. This study furthers our knowledge of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When kategoria is addressed, it is in light of the response rather than as a discrete rhetorical act. Butterworth (2008), Grano (2014), Harker (2018), and Kruse (1981a) all reference kategoria obliquely by referencing the underlying values that incite accusation but do not consider the utility it holds for the accuser.…”
Section: Sports Kategoria and Ownershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When kategoria is addressed, it is in light of the response rather than as a discrete rhetorical act. Butterworth (2008), Grano (2014), Harker (2018), and Kruse (1981a) all reference kategoria obliquely by referencing the underlying values that incite accusation but do not consider the utility it holds for the accuser.…”
Section: Sports Kategoria and Ownershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The history of sport crisis literature reflects these sources of transgressions, and sport crisis scholarship has focused most on the rhetorical self-defense of the offender. Other areas of sport crisis communication research have focused on organizational-level crises (Benoit, 2015;Coombs, 1998Coombs, , 2014Fortunato, 2008), individual-level crises (Benoit & Hanczor, 1994;Brazeal, 2008), fans' social media use as reaction and response to crisis (Brown & Billings, 2013), apologetic rhetoric in response to crisis (Benoit & Hanczor, 1994;Harker, 2017;Kruse, 1981), and new media (Sanderson, 2013;Sanderson & Hambrick, 2012). To extend this list, the current research focuses on how NFL stakeholders perceive sport crisis, whether those perceptions are informed by identification, and in what ways sports fans communicate perceptions throughout their social networks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%