1993
DOI: 10.3386/w4503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fixing Exchange Rates: A Virtual Quest for Fundamentals

Abstract: Fixed exchange rates are less volatile than floating rates. But the volatility of macroeconomic variables such as money and output does not change very much across exchange rate regimes. This suggests that exchange rate models based only on macroeconomic fundamentals are unlikely to be very successful. It also suggests that there is no clear tradeoff between reduced exchange rate volatility and macroeconomic stability.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

23
243
5
6

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(277 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
23
243
5
6
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Within this setting the stabilizing effect of the target zone on exchange rates results from tying down the hands of future monetary policy. However, as pointed out by Krugman and Miller (1993), the efficient market assumption is particularly misleading as policy-makers introduced target zone arrangements precisely because empirical research convinced them that exchange rates exhibit persistent misalignments (Rogoff, 1996) and excess volatility (Flood and Rose, 1995). In order to overcome this contradiction Sarno and Taylor (2002) suggest the analysis of target zone with the allowance for heterogeneous agents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Within this setting the stabilizing effect of the target zone on exchange rates results from tying down the hands of future monetary policy. However, as pointed out by Krugman and Miller (1993), the efficient market assumption is particularly misleading as policy-makers introduced target zone arrangements precisely because empirical research convinced them that exchange rates exhibit persistent misalignments (Rogoff, 1996) and excess volatility (Flood and Rose, 1995). In order to overcome this contradiction Sarno and Taylor (2002) suggest the analysis of target zone with the allowance for heterogeneous agents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the volatility of macroeconomic fundamentals such as money and output do not change much across currency regimes (Flood and Rose, 1995). Therefore, Flood and Rose (1995, p. 5) suggest that macroeconomic fundamentals alone are unable to explain exchange rate volatility: 3 3 "Exchange rate volatility" and "exchange rate stability"are used synonymously by Flood and Rose (1995). "Intuitively, if exchange rate stability varies across regimes without corresponding variation in macroeconomic volatility, then macroeconomic variables will be unable to explain much exchange rate volatility".…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…linear or nonlinear is also a matter for investigation. Ever since the influential work of Meese and Rogoff (1983) in which they examined the failure of some linear exchange rate models, several more recent studies have provided further evidence of the empirical failure of the linear models (Flood and Rose, 1995;Rose, 1996). The theoretical extension of the linear exchange rate framework to nonlinear models has been growing in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%