2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2022.109104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fixed-time synchronization for inertial Cohen–Grossberg delayed neural networks: An event-triggered approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark 1 Compared with the existing results [43,[51][52][53], the following are the key elements and advantages of this paper:…”
Section: Practically Exponential Input-to-state Stabilization Of Srdd...mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remark 1 Compared with the existing results [43,[51][52][53], the following are the key elements and advantages of this paper:…”
Section: Practically Exponential Input-to-state Stabilization Of Srdd...mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In recent decades, the event-triggered control mechanism has been introduced to NNs [48][49][50]. Especially, in [51], the author studied the fixedtime synchronization of inertial CGNNs via event-triggered control. In [52], the author studied the asymptotic synchronization of memristive CGNNs via event-triggered control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to accomplish the goal of accomplishing the intended synchronization in network model (1), it is imperative to configure a control protocol, that is, the control must be designed in such a way that matched disturbances are rejected, actuator faults are tolerated and the synchronization error system (5) must be asymptotically stable. Therefore, an unified control framework is built in the following form by merging the disturbance estimation and fault-tolerant control scheme: where  denotes the controller gain matrix that will be reckoned later; ρm (t) signifies the estimation of the disturbance 𝜌 m (t); Ω represents actuator fault matrix which is of the structure Ω = diag{𝜖 1 , 𝜖 2 , … , 𝜖 k }.…”
Section: Design Of Fault-tolerant Anti-disturbance Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, research on neural networks (NNs) has gained a prominent attention in the academic community because of its extensive applications in a wide range of fields such as deep learning, image processing, signal processing, and so forth. 1 Specifically, neurons and synapses are the two components of neural connections in neural networks that are considered to be of the utmost importance. Therein, synapses play an important part in receiving signals as well as in the plasticity and dynamic information memory of neuronal transmissions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to cope with this difficult issue, Polyakov [12] introduced FXT stability concept, in which its ST does not depend on the initial values of the system but only relevant on the system parameters and the controller gains. On this basis, a great number of scholars have studied FXT synchronization of various types of nonlinear systems [13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%