1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf01197591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fixed points of automorphisms of free Lie algebras

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is, in fact, not hard to show, and will be established in Section 2 (Corollary 2.2). For p = 2, Theorem 1 was proved in our earlier paper [4]. An easy consequence of the theorem is the following result (derived in Section 6).…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…This is, in fact, not hard to show, and will be established in Section 2 (Corollary 2.2). For p = 2, Theorem 1 was proved in our earlier paper [4]. An easy consequence of the theorem is the following result (derived in Section 6).…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Also, a n − b n + 2c n = λ n s , while a n + b n + c n is the dimension of the fixed point space of t in L n . By Theorem 1 of Bryant and Stöhr [5], the latter is 1 2 ψ n 2 . Thus we have three simultaneous linear equations which determine the three multiplicities: we may express a n from the first and last, b n from the first and second, and then c n from the last.…”
Section: The Case Of Gl 2mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Its integral representation theory is well understood: see Lee [20] or p. 752 in Curtis and Reiner [7]. There are 10 isomorphism types of indecomposables, and one can readily check that only 4 of those satisfy the two conditions that we know must hold for every direct summand of an L n with n = 2: as a module for the subgroup t , it can have no trivial direct summand (because of the corollary in Bryant and Stöhr [5]), and upon reduction modulo 3 it must not acquire a one-dimensional direct summand (because of the present Theorem 5.2). It follows that an unrefinable direct decomposition of an L n (with n = 2) can involve only those four indecomposables.…”
Section: The Conclusion For Gl 2mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations