2008
DOI: 10.1109/pesc.2008.4592000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fixed-frequency boundary control of buck converters with second-order switching surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, a hysteresis band, which is noise sensitive, is needed. Although some fixed-frequency boundary control methods have been proposed, they require an additional feedback loop for regulating the switching frequency [33]- [35]. The state trajectory control in [36]- [38] makes the converter reach the steady state for a step change in the input or output in one on/off control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, a hysteresis band, which is noise sensitive, is needed. Although some fixed-frequency boundary control methods have been proposed, they require an additional feedback loop for regulating the switching frequency [33]- [35]. The state trajectory control in [36]- [38] makes the converter reach the steady state for a step change in the input or output in one on/off control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, many time-domain dynamic control techniques with non-predictive boundary [1]- [8], such as hysteresis control [1]- [2] and sliding-mode control [3]- [5], or predictive boundary [6]- [7], have been proposed to be alternative to classical pulsewidth modulation scheme for switching converters. The main advantage of these methods is that they can provide fast transient response to large-signal disturbances, such as startup, load and reference disturbances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, these two drawbacks are mutually influenced. Although some fixed-frequency boundary control methods have been proposed, they require an additional switching frequency control loop [8]. A control method [10] that tackles the above drawbacks and retains the advantages of the time-domain dynamic control technique is proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, variable frequency under different operating line/load conditions, sensitivity of the parameters of output filter, high inductor current peak. To handle THE HKIE TRANSACTIONS • Volume 17 Number 4 these issues, several techniques have been proposed for buck-converter (Yan et al, 2008;Babazadeh and Maksimovic ' , 2009;Corradini et al, 2009) to achieve fixed frequency, parameter independent solution or programmed inductor current. However, one remaining fundamental issue which poses great challenges is that the same concept cannot be easily applied to converters with non-minimum-phase characteristics (Redl and Sun, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%