2009
DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2009.2022165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fixed-Frequency Boundary Control of Buck Converter With Second-Order Switching Surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Linear switching boundaries are rarely the best choice to produce fast large-signal transient response and acceptable small-signal performance. Higher-order switching boundaries [155], [156], [157] can be set up to support better tradeoffs. A second-order surface takes the form [155]…”
Section: A Geometric Control Methods In Dc-dc Convertersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linear switching boundaries are rarely the best choice to produce fast large-signal transient response and acceptable small-signal performance. Higher-order switching boundaries [155], [156], [157] can be set up to support better tradeoffs. A second-order surface takes the form [155]…”
Section: A Geometric Control Methods In Dc-dc Convertersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The schemes in [26][27][28][29] use an additional PI control loop that adjusts the width of the hysteresis band in order to achieve fixed switching frequency. This design requires the dynamics of the Frequency Control Loop (FCL) to be much slower as compared to the dynamics of the voltage and current control loops, as the faster dynamics may cause interaction with the outer control loops [26,27], hence the stability of the linearized system may not be ensured in this scenario [28,29]. In [30], the authors have proposed an FCL that monitors the time period of each switching cycle and compares it with a reference switching period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constant or limited switching frequency solutions, like those proposed in [5]- [7] or [14]- [22], are often sensitive to variations of system parameters (e.g., DC-link voltage, inductance value), to dead-times, and sampling delays. These factors, altogether, limit the practical effectiveness of the frequency regulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, these solutions employ additional analog hardware, which makes them relatively complex and sensitive to offsets, drifts, tolerances, and aging effects. For instance, operational amplifiers are needed in [4], whereas low latency comparators and/or digital to analog converters (DACs) are used in [5]- [6] and [15]- [22]. Likewise, frequency-to-voltage converters are adopted in [23]- [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%