2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fixed exchange rates and trade

Abstract: Abstract:A classic argument for a fixed exchange rate is its promotion of trade. Empirical support for this, however, is mixed. While one branch of research consistently shows a small negative effect of exchange rate volatility on trade, another, more recent, branch presents evidence of a large positive impact of currency unions on trade. This paper helps resolve this disconnect. Our results, which use a new data-based classification of fixed exchange rate regimes, show a large, significant effect of a fixed e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3 suggest that a one-day change from US$ 20 million to US$ 40 million raises the Colombian exchange rate by approximately Col $ 2. This means (all caveats considered) that actual interventions of US$ 1000 million, the amount mentioned by Fratzscher (2012) for the G3 countries, increase the exchange rate in one day by approximately 5.50% (using an exchange rate of $ 1,817 36 See Villar and Rincón (2000) and Klein and Shambaugh (2006). 37 Echavarría, Vásquez, and Villamizar (2009) do not find a significant impact for The last two authors also show that there is a variable risk premium which could explain the result.…”
Section: Ivamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 suggest that a one-day change from US$ 20 million to US$ 40 million raises the Colombian exchange rate by approximately Col $ 2. This means (all caveats considered) that actual interventions of US$ 1000 million, the amount mentioned by Fratzscher (2012) for the G3 countries, increase the exchange rate in one day by approximately 5.50% (using an exchange rate of $ 1,817 36 See Villar and Rincón (2000) and Klein and Shambaugh (2006). 37 Echavarría, Vásquez, and Villamizar (2009) do not find a significant impact for The last two authors also show that there is a variable risk premium which could explain the result.…”
Section: Ivamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, openness remains significant in our regressions. 35 In Panel B, we take logarithms for both dependent and independent variables. In this case, β 31 GDP per capita is calculated as GDP divided by the total population in each country.…”
Section: Empirical Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, see Asseery and Peel (1991) and Koray and Lastrapes (1989). 10 For instance, see Klein and Shambaugh (2006), Corsetti, et al (2000), and Pastine (2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gravity model for trade is probably one of the most successful empirical applications in international economics and has been used profusely, since the pioneering article by Tinbergen (1962), to analyse aspects of great importance such as: the impact on trade of the GATT/WTO system (Rose, 2004); regional trade agreements (Baier & Bergstrand, 2007); non-reciprocal trade agreements (Gil-Pareja et al, 2014); exchange rate systems (Klein & Shambaugh, 2006); or monetary unions (Rose, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%