1995
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(94)00433-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fixed-bed adsorption for bulk component system. Non-equilibrium, non-isothermal and non-adiabatic model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental uptake curves were directly fitted by the LDF kinetic model neglecting film mass-transfer resistance. These values agreed with the published data (Hashimoto and Smith, 1973;Gray and Do, 1991;Karger and Ruthven, 1992;Kumar, 1994;Hwang et al, 1995). When the sensitivity of LDF kinetic parameters was tested within the same order of the preceding values, no significant difference between the simulated results was found in the experimental range of this study.…”
Section: Bp"supporting
confidence: 90%
“…The experimental uptake curves were directly fitted by the LDF kinetic model neglecting film mass-transfer resistance. These values agreed with the published data (Hashimoto and Smith, 1973;Gray and Do, 1991;Karger and Ruthven, 1992;Kumar, 1994;Hwang et al, 1995). When the sensitivity of LDF kinetic parameters was tested within the same order of the preceding values, no significant difference between the simulated results was found in the experimental range of this study.…”
Section: Bp"supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Using the data from Table 1 The mass transfer coefficient k and the overall wall heat transfer coefficient h w were fitted and selected as 0.08 s −1 and 42 W/(m 2 K) respectively for the purpose of simulations. These values are comparable to those from other studies [10,12,20].…”
Section: Theoretical Studysupporting
confidence: 94%
“…due to the heat transfer effect through the column wall in the former. For the non-isothermal cases, the comparison between the gas and solid phase concentration profiles shows that the solid phase concentration profiles (especially Q * ) have plateau zones, indicating that Q * and Q are more significantly affected by temperature effects than the gas phase concentration which was also reported by Hwang et al [12]. The formation of this plateau zone for the solid phase concentration (especially Q * ) is because the equilibrium concentration Q * is dependent not only on the gas concentration but also on the temperature.…”
Section: Comparison Of Isothermal Non-isothermal-adiabatic and Non-isupporting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations