2019
DOI: 10.33312/ijar.454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fixed Assets Revaluation and Future Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from Indonesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although FAR has no direct effect on the current year's cash flow, it helps companies meet working capital needs by easing loan arrangements and reducing borrowing costs, which may positively influence future net profit after tax (NPAT) and net operating cash flow (NOCF). This argument is supported by Azmi and Ali (2019), who found a positive impact of FAR on future operating income. However, investors and lenders are more interested in NPAT and NOCF of concerned companies (Lee, Lee, Choi, & Kim, 2020;Nguyen & Nguyen, 2020).…”
Section: Hypothesis Regarding Far and Financial Numbers Gamementioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although FAR has no direct effect on the current year's cash flow, it helps companies meet working capital needs by easing loan arrangements and reducing borrowing costs, which may positively influence future net profit after tax (NPAT) and net operating cash flow (NOCF). This argument is supported by Azmi and Ali (2019), who found a positive impact of FAR on future operating income. However, investors and lenders are more interested in NPAT and NOCF of concerned companies (Lee, Lee, Choi, & Kim, 2020;Nguyen & Nguyen, 2020).…”
Section: Hypothesis Regarding Far and Financial Numbers Gamementioning
confidence: 82%
“…Using panel data of five years, Jamshidian and Sharifabadi (2016) found a significant positive association between capital increased through FAR and FFP expressed by operating profit and cash flows. The study by Azmi and Ali (2019) investigated the future effects of FAR and found positive effects on operating income but no significant effect on cash flow in Indonesia. The study conducted by Abbas, Fazal, Ali, and Faisal (2019) merely on the cement sector in Pakistan found a significant negative impact of FAR on FFP.…”
Section: Future Firm Performance (Ffp) and Farmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main argument behind FAR may be to show the fair value of fixed assets in the balance sheets of the respective companies (Azmi and Ali, 2019). Besides, companies applying the FAR model may have one or more objectives, such as determining the actual rate of return; identifying the appropriate market value of fixed assets; getting a bank loan by mortgaging assets; settling an asset price in case of merger or acquisition; communicating performance expectations for enhancing borrowing capacity and avoiding takeovers (Brown et al, 1992;Abody et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, companies applying the FAR model may have one or more objectives, such as determining the actual rate of return; identifying the appropriate market value of fixed assets; getting a bank loan by mortgaging assets; settling an asset price in case of merger or acquisition; communicating performance expectations for enhancing borrowing capacity and avoiding takeovers (Brown et al, 1992;Abody et al, 1999). Moreover, through upward FAR, managers can increase the equity of the stockholders, reduce the debt to equity ratio (DER), ensure an appropriate debt-equity mix in corporate capital structure, and reduce the debt costs (Azmi and Ali, 2019). Furthermore, upward FAR through the resultant increase of assets as well as equity also reduce profitability ratios, such as return on equity (ROE) and return on assets (ROA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%