1973
DOI: 10.1159/000169624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fixed and Variable Coupling of Ventricular Extrasystoles

Abstract: It is often difficult to distinguish between coupled extrasystoles and parasystole, since there are many cases with variable but non-parasystolic extrasystoles. Extrasystoles with variable coupling and parasystolic ectopic beats are usually associated with electrocardiographic signs of cardiac disease, and are uncommon in normal subjects. The QT segment appears to be unaltered in patients with extrasystoles. In variable and fixed coupling, the ectopic beats tend to occur just after the T wave, possibly because… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1975
1975
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study only two patients had parasystole using acceptable criteria (Talbot, 1973;Scherf and Schott, 1953), and other studies have shown that parasystole occurs in less than 5°4 of patients with aucte myociardial infarction (Baxter and McGuiness, 1974). The variable coupling was usually non-parasystolic (Talbot, 1973), although some recordings could have been interpreted as intermittent parasystole or parasystole with variable exit block. Such rhythms may be automatic in origin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study only two patients had parasystole using acceptable criteria (Talbot, 1973;Scherf and Schott, 1953), and other studies have shown that parasystole occurs in less than 5°4 of patients with aucte myociardial infarction (Baxter and McGuiness, 1974). The variable coupling was usually non-parasystolic (Talbot, 1973), although some recordings could have been interpreted as intermittent parasystole or parasystole with variable exit block. Such rhythms may be automatic in origin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…If there were > 600 msec between such extrasystoles the rhythm was considered idioventricular. Extrasystoles were considered ventricular on the usual criteria (Lipman and Massie, 1965;Talbot, 1973). Differentiation from aberrant conduction was based on the criteria of Marriott (Sandler and Marriott, 1965) but when in doubt the rhythm was considered supraventricular.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The perti nent literature suggests that these variants may be produced either by a varying exit block from a rapid parasystolic focus [2,17,19], or by concealed or manifest re-entry created by slowed conduction within an area of enhanced phase 4 activity [4,20]. Similar mechanisms have been invoked to explain the appearance of random, nonparasystolic ventricular extrasystoles [19,24,25], It has been noted on the screening of routine electrocardiograms that such extrasystoles and even slow ventricular tachycardia with an irregular rate have been associated with cardiac disease and with other serious arrhythmias [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier studies have shown that rigid categorization of extrasystoles into those with fixed coupling and those which are parasystolic, is unsatisfactory.6 Up to one-third of patients have extrasystoles with variable coupling, but there is no evidence of parasystole. 6 We have found that variation of coupling intervals increases when the dominant rhythm is slow and it seems logical to relate the range of actual coupling intervals to the range that is possible. However, even if more liberal criteria of fixed coupling are employed, many extrasystoles still have variable coupling but are nonparasystolic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%