2014
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fixation using alternative implants for the treatment of hip fractures (FAITH): design and rationale for a multi-centre randomized trial comparing sliding hip screws and cancellous screws on revision surgery rates and quality of life in the treatment of femoral neck fractures

Abstract: BackgroundHip fractures are a common type of fragility fracture that afflict 293,000 Americans (over 5,000 per week) and 35,000 Canadians (over 670 per week) annually. Despite the large population impact the optimal fixation technique for low energy femoral neck fractures remains controversial. The primary objective of the FAITH study is to assess the impact of cancellous screw fixation versus sliding hip screws on rates of revision surgery at 24 months in individuals with femoral neck fractures. The secondary… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous report 8 details the trial objectives and methods. All participating centres obtained ethics approval.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A previous report 8 details the trial objectives and methods. All participating centres obtained ethics approval.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Originally we determined that enrolment of 1500 patients would give the trial 81.5% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.75 in the sliding hip screw group, at a two-sided alpha level of 0.05, on the assumption that the percentage of the primary outcome in the cancellous screws group would be 25% (appendix). 8 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…26 Durante a realização da presente pesquisa, estava em andamento um estudo internacional, multicêntrico e randomizado, conhecido pela sigla FAITH (Fixation using alternative implants for the treatment of hip fractures). 24,27 Por meio da avaliação da qualidade de vida e do resultado funcional relacionados a fraturas desviadas e não desviadas do colo femoral tratadas por métodos de osteossínteses, o estudo, quando concluído, pretende dar melhor embasamento científico para a indicação da escolha do paciente que deve ser submetido a essas modalidades de tratamento.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…All study outcomes (as defined above) will be documented on the case report forms (CRFs) at each follow-up visit. A 12-month follow-up was selected because it is a standard follow-up period for patients with tibial and femoral shaft fractures and it is a commonly used follow-up period for similar fracture trials [33, 39]. In addition, it is a commonly referenced time period for fracture healing complications requiring reoperation and will further inform decisions surrounding the larger, definitive RCT.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%