1999
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199912000-00016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fixation, Polyethylene Wear, and Pelvic Osteolysis in Primary Total Hip Replacement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
69
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
69
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Reducing wear in THA is of particular importance in the younger patient population. Conventional polyethylene historically has had varying wear rates from 0.1 mm per year to greater than 0.25 mm per year [24][25][26]39]. These wear rates are considerably higher than those in our cohort of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reducing wear in THA is of particular importance in the younger patient population. Conventional polyethylene historically has had varying wear rates from 0.1 mm per year to greater than 0.25 mm per year [24][25][26]39]. These wear rates are considerably higher than those in our cohort of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Implant wear and secondary osteolysis are major causes of THA failure and are of particular concern in young patients undergoing THA because of long lifespans [7,20,26,33,38]. Therefore, alternative bearing surfaces have been introduced to minimize wear particle-induced implant failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a common reason for implant failure in MoP THA (Maloney et al 1999, Sochart 1999. The likelihood of osteolysis has been correlated with the amount of wear particles (Dumbleton et al 2002).…”
Section: Periprosthetic Osteolysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The long-term survivorship of the metal-on-PE THA is limited by the biologic reaction to PE wear [23,24,30]. Consequently, attempts have been made to reduce PE wear with the ultimate goal of increasing implant survival [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%