Five years of research on counseling.

Callis, Robert; Polmantier, Paul C.; Roeber, Edward C.

doi:10.1037/h0043102

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 4 publications

(4 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, a study by Proff (1952) and discussion of his findings by Callis, Polmantier, and Roeber (1957) suggested that the DRQ may reflect movement "toward problem solution" if it is computed on the basis of patient discussion of feeling-laden material rather than "cognitive" material. Lebo and Applegate (1958) and Callis et al (1957) found that DRQ ratings depended in part on the topic of discussion. The former concluded that to the extent that therapists influence topics of discussion, DRQ ratings reflect an interaction effect between therapist and patient rather than a purely internal state of the patient.…”

Section: Investigation Of Internal Statesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Content-analysis studies of therapeutic interviews: 1954 to 1964.

Marsden¹

1965

Psychological Bulletin

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Content analysis traditionally implies a limited set of criteria and procedures, comprising what is here called the classical model. Some studies of therapeutic interviews have deviated from 1 or more of these prescriptions, leading to debate about their methodological status. This paper argues that certain common deviations from the classical model constitute other models which reflect responses to problems posed by the data, the variables under study, and investigator personality characteristics. Rationales for 2 such models are presented, studies representing all 3 models are reviewed, and certain issues common to this body of research are discussed.* Bollard and Auld (1959, pp. 10-12) are the only analysts working in the period covered by this paper, to the writer's knowledge, who made a formal distinction between scoring, contextual, and summarizing units. The scoring unit is the entity that is

show abstract

Section: Investigation Of Internal Statesmentioning

confidence: 99%