2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1352-2310(00)00171-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Five years of nitrogen dioxide measurement with diffusion tube samplers at over 1000 sites in the UK

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
19
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…3.3). These results are in agreement with the variations found between different laboratories for duplicate analysis equal to ±25%, which is acceptable for indicative monitoring (Stevenson et al, 2001) and within the accuracy limit recommended by the European Union directive (EU, 1999).…”
Section: Chemical Analysissupporting
confidence: 90%
“…3.3). These results are in agreement with the variations found between different laboratories for duplicate analysis equal to ±25%, which is acceptable for indicative monitoring (Stevenson et al, 2001) and within the accuracy limit recommended by the European Union directive (EU, 1999).…”
Section: Chemical Analysissupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The standard deviations for multipollutant samples were found to be 4 % for NO 2 and 20 % for HNO 3 and for Analyst samplers 5 % for NO 2 and 26 % for HNO 3 . These results were in agreement with the variations found by other studies [34,35] and also fulfil the ±25 % uncertainty requirement of the European Directive for indicative monitoring with diffusion samplers [36]. Higher values of the standard deviations were found for HONO measured by the multipollutant samplers (approximately 68 %).…”
Section: In Field Use Of Analyst and Multipollutant Samplersupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The passive diffusion tube originates from Palmes (Palmes, 1981), and that tube and various modifications have been used in many European studies (Atkins and Lee, 1995;Monn et al, 1997;Roorda-Knape et al, 1998;Perkauskas and Mikelinskiene, 1998;Glasius et al, 1999;Lebret et al, 2000;Stevenson et al, 2001), as well as in El Paso, Texas for two weeks in 1999 (Gonzales et al, 2005). The passive diffusion tube has undergone many validation studies (Heal and Cape, 1997;Ayers et al, 1998;Heal et al, 1999;Kasper-Giebl and Puxbaum, 1999), with a yearlong multi-site validation test undertaken in the United Kingdom (UK) from April, 1996-March, 1997.…”
Section: Study Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%